Is the DEA using information gathered by the NSA to prosecute Americans for non-terror related crimes?
I have made the point in several recent posts that America is already in a soft police state and that if we did not begin to reign in the Federal Government and agencies such as the NSA that it would only be a matter of time before we were in a hard police state.
If this story is true we may be closer to the hard police state than I imagined. The DEA is using a program which began in 1994 with the intent of targeting Latin American drug cartels to prosecute American citizens. The information used in the prosecution comes from wiretaps and telephone records. Sound familiar?
A secretive U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants and a massive database of telephone records to authorities across the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.
Once again we have an example of a government program expanding well beyond its original intent, but it gets much worse:
The undated documents show that federal agents are trained to “recreate” the investigative trail to effectively cover up where the information originated, a practice that some experts say violates a defendant’s Constitutional right to a fair trial. If defendants don’t know how an investigation began, they cannot know to ask to review potential sources of exculpatory evidence – information that could reveal entrapment, mistakes or biased witnesses.
DEA agents are taught how to recreate the trail which led to the arrest! ‘Recreate’ sounds an awful lot like cover up and hide where the information came from because to admit where it came from would constitute a violation of our Constitutional rights.
But the DEA is not acting alone because this information has to come from somewhere, so who is the DEA partnering with?
Two dozen partner agencies comprise the unit, including the FBI, CIA, NSA, Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Homeland Security.
The agency has partnered with the IRS, which is guilty of targeting political enemies, and with the NSA, which is guilty of illegally gathering information on all emails, browsing history, and telephone calls of virtually all American citizens.
We have been told that the NSA was simply data-mining and that the actual content of the emails and the telephone calls were not being monitored, but rather the information was being used to flag dangerous patterns related to national security.
So, the DEA and the NSA are partners and while we are told our private correspondence is not being monitored it certainly appears as if the DEA is indeed monitoring the content of emails and telephone records for use in cases which have nothing to do with national security.
There can be only one reason, in my opinion, why the DEA would feel the need to hide where the information came from and that is because it came from ill-gotten and unconstitutional means.
“It is one thing to create special rules for national security,” Gertner said. “Ordinary crime is entirely different. It sounds like they are phonying up investigations.”
The American people had better start putting two and two together and realize that all of these spying scandals are not individual scandals but rather are linked before it is too late…..if isn’t already.
Slowly but surely we are being drained of our Constitutional rights. America’s Watchtower’s tagline is a quote from James Madison: “I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations.”
That quote has never seemed so true than it does right now.
Rate this:
Share this:
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

And just where are the GOP folks? Can’t they mount a feeble outrage?
LikeLike
At this point we have t believe the GOP was also deeply involved in this, why else would they not condemn it? Michelle Bachmann called Snowden a traitor for exposing what the Feds were up to and that alone leads me to believe the Republican knew what was going on, and agreed with it, all along!
LikeLike
I’m confident that the Republicans are involved with this. Remember back in ’07-’08 when the warrantless wiretaps was all the rage? The end result of that was that companies that worked with government would be immune to criminal and civil penalties. Now, we have companies willingly giving any and all data to the federal governments whether or not there is a warrant. Those that do not comply are forced into compliance by secret courts given to us by the Patriot act.
Big brother has teeth and is watching. It seems he’s been watching for quite a while.
LikeLike
I have to agree with you at this point. I was one of those who said at the time that if you had nothing to hide you had nothing to fear but I was wrong. There was bipartisan support for the PATRIOT Act and it was a Republican president who signed it into law, at the time I supported it but now I realize my error. Neither side can be trusted anymore because they do not have our best interests at heart, they only care about scaring the people to remain in power.
LikeLike
Terrant, even the most innocent of information can be turned around to something that can be used against you. That the cell phone companies are complying with this so easily is scary. Makes you pick and choose your words now, doesn’t it? I read articles about all the “smart” appliances we have now that “they” can monitor and the cable boxes that are able to watch us. In the past, I would have said that was pretty far fetched they would do that to control us, but not now…I put nothing past the government spying on us. What has this country become?
As for the “smart” meters they are forcing people to have installed in their homes, I know they are causing a lot of health issues. They also will have the ability at that point to control the settings or turn things off. I still think if we are paying for the service we have the right to control what we want, but I think my way of thinking is slowing disappearing. In the end, the people will comply with the attitude that “it is just the way it is” or as a friend of mine says, “it is what it is”. I just can’t get myself to say that, but a lot of people have just given up the fight and will just accept it. Sad, isn’t it?
LikeLike
Recreate is another word for being sneaky about how they violate our constitutionally protected rights. Can I even say contitutionall protected these days?
LikeLike
Don’t you just love the term ‘recreate’?! At this point constitutionally protected is just words on paper.
LikeLike
Is that on the list with “misspoke”?
LikeLike
Yes, and ‘misremember.’
LikeLike
Incrementalism is the M.O. of the left and the government. Hey, that’s redundant.
LikeLike
Exactly, but by bit and piece by piece we are losing our freedoms and our rights.
LikeLike