The Syrian rebels are being trained by the terrorists who carried out the Benghazi attack
It is now being reported, in this article, that the Syrian rebels–the same rebels Barack Obama is preparing to defend against Bashar Assad–are actually being trained in terrorist camps by Ansar al-Sharia.
If that name rings a bell in your head, it should. But in case it doesn’t, Ansar al-Sharia is the terrorist organization which is responsible for carrying out the attack in Benghazi which left Chris Stevens, (after being raped and sodomized), Glen Doherty, Sean Smith, and Tyrone Woods dead.
So to recap: Barack Obama supported the ouster of Muammar Gaddafi in Lybia, which predictably led to an uprising of al-Qaeda in that nation. This very same al-Qaeda led the attack on the consulate in Benghazi, and was able to do so because the president left the country leaderless, and now that same group is training the rebels in Syria we are about to help.
This is quite the incestuous relationship Barack Obama has with al-Qaeda and again I am forced to ask this question; which side is Barack Obama on?
Trackbacks
- WMD’s AND THE INSANE HATRED OF MIDDLE EASTERN MARTYRS | Josiahe’s Blog
- John McCain and Lindsey Graham meet with Barack Obama, support regime change in Syria | America's Watchtower
- John Boehner and Eric Cantor support taking action in Syria | America's Watchtower
- Harry Reid delays Senate vote on attacking Syria | America's Watchtower
- September 11th, 2013: We have forgotten | America's Watchtower
America's Watchtower 
Sounds like he is an agent for the Muslim Brotherhood. How many Ch
LikeLike
That is what I take out of this whole thing.
LikeLike
I rest my case:
http://brittius.com/2013/08/27/questions-answered/
LikeLike
Thanks for the link, for some reason I was not able to comment on your blog. I think his words are clear and there is no doubt any longer in my mind that Barack Obama is a Muslim.
LikeLike
Steve, I put out over 100 posts per day on some days, and average roughly 97 or 98. The comments were turned off after twenty-four hours because some people were jumping on articles weeks or months after being posted and it lead up to me having to slam on the brakes when that happened to again bring myself up to speed and remind the commenter that when the article was posted, certain facts were known at that time. I apologize for this, and if you need to get hold of me, simply go to the top of the page and jump onto the “My 2 Cents”.
Regarding the reblog, you are always welcome. It is my pleasure to post articles that are well written and have substance.
LikeLike
Ah, that makes sense no need to apologize. I know what you mean because it has happened to me as well. Sometimes people do not look at the date articles were published and jump all over me not understanding that the article is out of date and may no longer be relevant or accurate.
100 articles a day! WOW!
Thanks for the compliment.
LikeLike
At this point in time I will only say that if Obama does attack Syria it should be just to destroy the chemical weapon depots and the Syrian airstrips and planes. We cannot trust these weapons in the hands of Assad or the Syrian rebels—they will be used again. I suspect, that many of these WMD’s came to Syria via Saddam during the U.S. invasion. There will be collateral damage if these depots are hit, a great deal, and for that reason I suspect they will be left untouched in any attack. You are absolutely correct in saying that many of these rebels are associated with Islamic extremist groups to say the least. There is no easy way out of this mess and any action or lack of action has its downside.
LikeLike
You are right, there is no easy way out and I do not doubt that these were Saddam’s weapons.
LikeLike
If OB does bomb one consequence may be if a cache is not destroyed it may fall into the rebels hands. So now we have only made the situation worse. And what about collateral damage? If we kill more than 150 people then what?
LikeLike
If the weapons are not already in the hands of the rebels. If chemical weapons were used we really do not know which side used them. I wonder if the rebels used them to draw the US in on their side.
LikeLike
I”m not saying that bombing would be an end to the WMD problem in Syria, but only that it would lessen it. I suspect rebel groups already have their hands on some, but after all it is war. Like I said before there is no good solution—only bad one thanks to the timid actions of Barack Obama in the past. He has managed to turn a bad situation into a terrible one. But then he is good at that. As for collateral damage—-who knows?
LikeLike
There is no doubt that Obama has done nothing to ameliorate the crisis and has only deepened it. (Paraphrasing General Lee in my favorite movie, Gods and Generals)
LikeLike
I like that quote from Lee—although just a movie. But the one movie quote that has stuck in my mind was from “Gettysbury”, before the battle one general on the southern side said, and for the life of me I can’t remember which one: when talking about politics and politicians said, “politicians only complicate the obvious while trivializing the momentous”! Truer words were never spoken.
LikeLike
I like that quote as well, it really is true.
LikeLike
Well, he is not on the side of stability in the Midddle East. And, he was not on Ambassador Steven”s side. And, he sure as hell is not on America’s side. What did America ever do to deserve Barack Obama?
LikeLike
I wish I had an answer to that question, but I do not.
LikeLike
Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance
by Barack Obama
LikeLike
“Rules for Radicals” by Saul Alinsky…This book will explain this man’s actions!
LikeLike
Yep, this is who Obama is and people should have been paying attention to his past words and associations and they would have known this.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Freedom Is Just Another Word….
LikeLike
Thank you.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on swissdefenceleague and commented:
The Syrian rebels are being trained by the terrorists who carried out the Benghazi attack
LikeLike
Thank you!
LikeLike