Benghazi: Darrell Issa blames Hillary Clinton’s policy of normalization for the attack

    Darrell Issa spoke out yesterday about his investigation into the terrorist attack in Benghazi which left Chris Stevens (after being sodomized), Glen Doherty, Sean Smith, and Tyrone Woods dead and it is clear where he thinks the blame belongs:

Responsibility for the September 11 Benghazi assault and the deaths of four U.S. citizens — including Libyan ambassador Chris Stevens — lies personally at the feet of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, according to California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa.

“The investigation really is now not about what we know, but about how we can prevent abuse of security before the fact, how we respond during the fact, and how we hold people accountable after the fact for deliberate misinformation — if you want to be kind — [and] outright lies, if not,” said Issa, who serves as head of the Oversight and Government reform committee.

“We know from Hillary Clinton on down there was a policy of normalization to make it appear as though we had won the war on terror,” Issa said. “I was in Libya just the other day, and one thing that I came back with was a strong opinion that that ‘stand down’ had everything to do with the fight between Department of State headed Hillary Clinton and the Defense Department, and that ultimately, State was willing to put their assets in, and did not want any military assets in, because they did not want to escalate what ultimately should have been escalated to a real rescue mission.”

  According to Darrell Issa, Hillary Clinton had a policy of “normalization” designed to make it appear as if we were winning the war on terror and when push came to shove she was unwilling to help our heroes because she did not want to escalate the violence in the region.

  I believe this is true but it does not go far enough for we need to look at the reasons behind both this policy and Hillary Clinton’s deadly decision to stand down. Why is it that Hillary Clinton would want it to seem as if we were winning the war on terror when clearly we were not?

  Because it just happened to be an election year in which Barack Obama was claiming that al-Qaeda was on the run, that is why this policy was in place. It would take the willing suspension of disbelief to not entertain the possibility that this normalization policy was conducted and implemented by Hillary Clinton without Barack Obama’s approval. Clearly she would not have acted on her own during an election year when Barack Obama was fighting for his political life.

  Whether Hillary Clinton liked it or not she was working for the Obama regime and this means that she was acting on behalf of the president. It is clear to me that Barack Obama decided that his reelection was more important than the lives of the four people who died on that night and she was tasked with protecting the Dear Leader at all costs.

  The only question which remains is this: What is Darrell Issa going to do about it?