Is the Supreme Court ready to rule Barack Obama’s recess appointments unconstitutional?
Today the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case involving Barack Obama’s non-recess recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, and according to this article the Court looks poised to rule against Barack Obama in a lopsided manner.
Liberal Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan joined all the conservative justices and Anthony Kennedy in sharply questioning the legality of Obama’s actions.
While it is unclear whether the Court will rule narrowly or broadly, it does seem clear the Obama lost today at the Court, potentially by a lopsided 8-1 vote (if not unanimous against him).
Take this for what it is worth because it is based solely on appearances, or the interpretation of appearances, of people who watched the proceedings today.
I still remember the analysis of the Supreme Court’s Obamacare hearing; we were told the Obama regime did a disastrous job in defending the legislation, and we were told that at points the Justices appeared to be mocking the Obama regime. This led to speculation that the individual mandate was dead and we all know how that turned out, don’t we?
Reblogged this on Brittius.com.
LikeLike
Thank you.
LikeLike
You’re welcome.
LikeLike
The fat lady hasn’t sung yet. Maybe with John Boy Roberts leading the way they’ll declare Zero’s illegal appointments a tax. Keep in mind there is a good chance the administration has something on Roberts.
LikeLike
It is rumored that Roberts illegally trafficked children out of Ireland so that he could adopt them and that is what Obama is holding over his head. If true Bush, and everyone who supported Roberts, should have done their homework.
LikeLike
U.S. General: Obama’s Military Purge ‘Criminal And Treasonous’ http://youtu.be/_ljP3zsYxvM Saw this early today on SGT report. Linked to a WND article that states ‘“purge” of top-level U.S. military officers during the Obama administration, with estimates of the number of senior officers fired during the last five years edging toward 200?’ How’s that helping the Labor dept. numbers?
LikeLike
Somehow I have a feeling they don’t count these people in the job numbers.
LikeLike