New Hampshire Senate hopeful Bob Smith lashes out at Scott Brown and the Republican establishment
It seems all but certain at this point that Scott Brown will be entering the Republican primary in the hopes of winning the nomination and facing off against Jeanne Shaheen in the general election in November.
As I have written in the past, there are many New Hampshire voters who see Scott Brown as a carpetbagger who cannot be trusted to vote the right way most of the time. It is clear to me that he is the establishment’s choice and because of this he will receive the money and the support from Washington and will be the nominee.
Now that it appears as if Scott Brown is in, his three primary opponents began to speak out against him, the most vocal being Bob Smith. If the name Bob Smith rings a bell it is because he is the former New Hampshire Senator who lost in the Republican primary to John Sununu in 2002. Since that time he has been living in Florida where he has unsuccessfully tried twice to run for the Senate.
Now he is back and to be honest I consider this move to be politically motivated and I see no difference between Bob Smith returning to New Hampshire to run for office and Scott Brown moving to New Hampshire to do the same.
But he wasted no time in lashing out against Scott Brown and the Republican establishment, here is part of what he had to say:
He said he, Rubens an Testerman “are being ignored by the establishment.
“This is really something. To have a Massachusetts liberal being promoted, actually being pushed, by the powers in Washington and the establishment here in New Hampshire to run against three people who have been on the ground here for decades is really pretty bizarre.
“I say, ‘No way.’ I don’t think it’s going to sell. I’m going to make the case. When we desert our principles as a party we lose,” said Smith.
I just think it’s bizarre that they would insult not only the candidates but also the voters,” said Smith.
I agree with 99% of that statement but I have to take issue with his assertion that he has been on the ground here in New Hampshire for decades. Yes, he once was but he has not been involved in New Hampshire politics for a decade. That being said, he then lowered the boom on Scott Brown:
Brown “is closer to Jeanne Shaheen than he is to me,” said Smith. “He’s anti-gun. He’s anti-life. He voted for ‘Romneycare’ in the Massachusetts legislature and when it was convenient to vote against it, he voted against Obamacare in the U.S. Senate.”
Smith also charged that Brown “voted with Obama 70 percent of the time. He ought to be in a Democratic primary.”
It is clear that Bob Smith, Jim Rubens, and Karen Testerman are prepared to attack Scott Brown where he is most vulnerable with the voters and while the outcome of this race is a foregone conclusion at least it has injected a little excitement into what was otherwise a very lifeless primary season.

I was a teenager growing up in Greenwich Village when Bobby Kennedy became first a New Yorker and then a Senator. There was a great debate then, even among liberals, who had little argument with his politics. The question was how on earth, in a state with more than (then) 10 million citizens, it was so difficult to find a single person qualified enough to represent us in the Senate that we had to import gentleman from Massachusetts.
RFK, though, had the charisma and the Kennedy cachet. I don’t see anything similar that Brown brings to New Hampshire’s table – as you describe him, and Smith as well, they seem far more like opportunistic carpetbaggers.
But as you say, primary season in New Hampshire suddenly looks a lot more interesting!
Take good care and may God bless us all!
TGY
LikeLike
I have to say that I am too young to remember this and I have not read enough about it to have a real opinion but I will say this: It bothers the hell out of me that the two parties are hand picking candidates and sending them to various states to run for office because they are putting their parties ahead of what is best for the individual states. They know these handpicked candidates will win the nomination because they will be well funded. We saw this in Massachusetts with Deval Patrick and Lizzy Warren and now we are seeing it in New Hampshire, I am not sure if this is happening all across the nation but it is happening in the Northeast and I do not like it at all.
LikeLike
I was a teenager, born in Manhattan growing up in NJ, and as I recall RFK was your run of the mill CARPETBAGGER! Of course his millions which in today’s money might be billions gave him license to do whatever the hell he wanted to do not unlike Hillary’s fat ass and eternal scowl which entitled her to run for the senate in NY.
LikeLike
Huh – use of all caps and references to candidates appearance rather than any meaningful comments about her policy or positions – or does having a fat ass make someone unfit to serve?
LikeLike
You ‘re right. The hag of Benghazi has the same right as a runway model to serve her adoring public.
LikeLike