Weather channel founder says man-made global warming is baloney
We recently celebrated the 18th anniversary of there being no global warming, as confirmed by a former NASA scientist and weather satellite data, but this has not slowed down alarmists such as John Kerry from fear-mongering on this issue.
A couple of days ago John Coleman, a founder of the Weather Channel and a scientist, had some interesting comments to make about global warming.
Here is more:
On the same day that the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a major new global warming report, John Coleman, a founder of the Weather Channel, appeared on CNN Sunday to reiterate his stance that “climate change is not happening.”
Describing himself as a “skeptic,” not a denier – “that is a word meant to put me down” – the veteran weather forecaster told CNN’s “Reliable Sources” that the news network was promoting an inaccurate view on the issue.
“CNN has taken a very strong position on global warming, that it is a consensus,” he said. “Well, there is no consensus in science. Science isn’t a vote, science is about facts.”
“And if you get down to the hard, cold facts, there’s no question about it: Climate change is not happening, there is no significant, man-made global warming now, there hasn’t been any in the past, and there’s no reason to expect any in the future. There’s a whole lot of baloney.”
Coleman said climate change has become part of the Democratic Party platform, adding that he regretted that the issue has become “political instead of scientific.”
“But the science is on my side,” he declared.
Science is not consensus, this is something that many of us have been saying for quite some time and this is also something the alarmists would rather forget about.
But what about the claim that 97% of climate scientists view man-made global warming is a fact? How can he dispute that? How can science be on his side when 97% of the climate scientists say it is not? Read on:
Challenged on the assertion that “97 percent of climate scientists” are in agreement on the issue, Coleman charged that the figure was “manipulated.”
Since the government only funds scientists who put out results “supporting the global warming hypothesis,” he claimed, “they don’t have any choice.”
“If you’re going to get the money, you’ve got to support their position. Therefore 97 percent of the scientific reports published support global warming. Why? Because those are the ones the government pays for and that’s where the money is.”
Bingo! That is a point that I have made several times on America’s Watchtower. Many of these scientists are receiving government money to conduct their studies and when the government has a direct stake in the outcome you had better fall in line or risk losing your funding.
When this happens it is not science, it is propaganda…
America's Watchtower 
A voice of reason. Will anyone in government listen? There is and in in CO2 in the atmosphere. That is true and it is mostly likely due to human activity. But, real scientist do not know if it will have a warming effect or a cooling effect. In the end, it doesn’t matter. If warming does occur, mankind had better learn to adjust, because what the warming alarmist want is not acceptable or the least bit reasonable.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Of course we know the government will not listen because they have an agenda. This is not about the environment, it is about control…
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is our ‘government’ today? It’s like this very propaganda – it’s not what it appears or said to be. Those in leadership positions today aren’t the Constitutional Gov. obviously – rather they’re Deconstructionist – tear down and rebuild in their own image something totally different [Nero comes to mind] – while keeping the people ‘numb’ to the truth of what they’re doing. If their ‘change is so Good’ why not bring it out in the open for everyone to ’embrace!’ Because it isn’t Good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tear if down and rebuild it, that is what Obama meant by fundamental change. I wish more people questioned what he meant because the foundation of this nation is the Constitution and his statement suggests he wants to change the foundation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think its incredibly arrogant to believe that man could possibly impact God’s creation in such a way. The earth has been through these cycles before, and without our help! She could shake us all off of her like a dog with flies if she wanted (I think I used that analogy before, HA!) What an ego man has. Do we have an effect of the earth, sure. But if she wants to go warm she will go warm on her own and without our help…IMHO. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think they know they cannot change anything, I think this is an excuse for control.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It seems always about control…and fear. Conform Americans through fear, and in so many ways.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is what the EPA is in spades. The little munchkins are on the review panel— the very ones that received the grants.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The fix is in…
LikeLiked by 1 person
If the strings were pulled to raise the ‘blinds’, how much would we see – of these thing purported to be ‘real’! Vets Today had an article that if the string of truth was pulled on the JFK killing the domino effect would occur and everyone would see how the ‘takeover groups’ have been manufacturing false flags and such for a long time – shining the light of truth on the inside job of 911, the destroyed files where the missile hit the Pentagon, Boston Marathon, Sandy Hook, etc. etc. etc. … & Ebola. At least this is part of the string being pulled to help crack their false platform to increase taxes, control & power.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just saw this – fitting: The Hidden Government Group Linking JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra and 9/11 – http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/10/05/the-hidden-government-group-linking-jfk-watergate-iran-contra-and-911/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, I have not checked it out yet but I will.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on SilentSoldier.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I keep repeating myself, but thanks again! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, finding out that you weren’t paranoid enough is bad. It really has gotten crazy enough these last years that it’s easy to believe our gov’t is up to something real bad.
On Anthropogenic Global Warming, we can also add Buzz Aldrin to the list of skeptics. Anyone ready to try trashing his scientific credentials? There is nothing settled about the science, especially with such massive evidence of power politics and profit.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2814701/I-sceptical-humans-causing-global-warming-says-Buzz-Aldrin-thinks-people-sent-DIE-Mars.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, I will check it out.
LikeLike