Skip to content

John Kerry admits the potential US/Iran nuclear deal will be non-binding

March 13, 2015

 A couple of days ago John Kerry admitted that the deal the President is seeking with Iran over nuclear policy will be non-binding. Here is more:

Secretary of State John Kerry told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today that the nuclear-weapons agreement the Obama administration is trying to negotiate with Iran–where the Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is supreme leader and commander in chief–will be an agreement “between leaders of a country” and will not be a “legally binding plan.”

  I find that admission to be very interesting in light of the heat some Republicans have been taking from the left for sending an open letter to the leaders of Iran.

  johnkerryIf you have read the letter these Republicans sent to the leaders of Iran, which has been deemed mostly true by Politifact, you will find that this is exactly what the Republicans were saying–and nothing more. You can read the letter in its entirety here.

  So, in effect, John Kerry agrees with the Republicans that this deal will be nothing more than an Executive Action which can be rescinded or changed at any time by future (or current) regimes and yet he does not seem to be taking the same flack as Republicans who are now being called traitors by some on the left.

  For the record: I think the Republicans made a mistake by sending this letter to Iran and I  think it will come back to haunt them because the mainstream media will use it against them as “proof” they are only interested in undermining Barack Obama. They should have waited to see what was in the deal before they opposed it.

  Having said that; the Constitution, in Article III Section 3, clearly and narrowly defines what constitutes treason: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

  Under this definition it is quite clear to me, despite the clamor from the left, that these Senators are not levying war against the individual States and neither are they offering aid and comfort to the enemies, in fact it is quite the opposite, and therefor there is not even a smidgen of treason here. 

  But of course this will not stop the left, many of whom have probably never read the Constitution and do not know what it deems as traitorous, from claiming otherwise. And how many of those on the left who do understand this will put John Kerry in the same category as the Republicans who signed this letter for basically admitting that he agrees with, whether he wants to admit it or not, that what was in this letter is true? 

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

19 Comments leave one →
  1. March 13, 2015 9:01 pm

    The claim is not only treason, but also violating the Logan Act.

    “Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

    “This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.”

    Key section being ‘without authority.’ The Constitution says the Senate gives its advice and consent regarding treaties.

    Phony scandal, there is no ‘there’ there, hehe. Seriously, the Senators didn’t break any laws. Bad form maybe.

    My objection to the whole thing is that the Constitution authorizes treaties but not executive orders, executive actions, or executive agreements. The whole idea was to prevent one branch from having too much power, to prevent one person from getting the Country into trouble. Kerry says this agreement isn’t legally binding, meaning neither side has to keep to the agreement, meaning it’s worthless, meaning WTF are they doing it for???

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Zip-a-Dee permalink
    March 13, 2015 9:30 pm

    Appropriate ‘creepy’ photo of him Steve. Something to tag to this ‘OBAMA REVEALS WAR PLANS TO ISIS, LEADER STATES OBAMA PAYS ISIS $600 PER NEW RECRUIT’ http://www.truthandaction.org/obama-reveals-war-plans-isis-pays-isis-600-per-new-recruit/comment-page-1/#comment-1059132 Most everyone knows Isis is Islam is Muslim is Obola. The Dems are using whatever and whoever to further the span of division in all areas. This source is limited, but it sounds about right. They’re using ‘their made up Isis’ for a false flag. Kerry probably isn’t even in the loop of what’s going on – just a shell saying what he’s told to say. As long as he has a ‘sense of importance and prominence’ he’s okay about it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • March 14, 2015 5:26 am

      For some reason I could only read the first page, the second page could not be found. However from what I read it certainly sounds as if Obama is tipping off ISIS so they can get out of the way in time.

      Liked by 1 person

      • March 14, 2015 6:43 pm

        The 2nd page is missing that had the vid – I didn’t see it either – the headlines is what got my attention. Clicking on it today it sends you to a different headline: “OBAMA: I’M NOT BREAKING THE LAW, I’M JUST ‘EXPANDING MY AUTHORITY’” A bit off topic from your original, but we know what they say and what’s going on are usually to different things. Of course he’s breaking the Law – liar.

        Liked by 1 person

      • March 14, 2015 7:05 pm

        Wait a minute. He actually said that? WOW! Unbelievable.

        Liked by 1 person

      • March 14, 2015 7:15 pm

        Unbelievable but not surprising Laura. Of course we see an expansion of power as unconstitutional and because we believe the Constitution is the law of the land we see this as breaking the law. However liberals do not consider the Constitution to be law so they do not see this the same way we do.

        Like

      • March 14, 2015 7:32 pm

        I have been discussing that with a couple of people on other forums. One guy actually said that obama hasn’t violated the Constitution until SCOTUS says he has violated it. He also believes that the Constitution means whatever SCOTUS says it means.

        How can we make the necessary corrections when so many people don’t even know the truth? Sigh.

        Liked by 1 person

      • March 14, 2015 7:39 pm

        That would be what the left likes to claim; the Constitution is a living document which can be redefined as the times see fit. I agree the Constitution is a living document but only because it provides us with the means to change it if we want to and that is through amending it through the legal process. But that process is too slow for the liberals so they seek to change it through the courts and they have been successful because too many of the people do not understand how the system is supposed to work. I wish I had an answer to your question but I do not…

        Liked by 1 person

  3. lou222 permalink
    March 14, 2015 12:32 pm

    OT, but very important! What happens when the FEDS step in to local and state issues? Anyone? Well, this is a “pilot” program from the FEDS….any guess what the outcome will be?

    http://www.al.com/news/birmingham/index.ssf/2015/03/birmingham_1_of_6_pilot_sites.html

    Liked by 1 person

    • March 14, 2015 12:54 pm

      This is terrible, lou. Stupid, stupid people.

      Liked by 1 person

      • lou222 permalink
        March 14, 2015 2:13 pm

        But, Laura, it is for our own safety and well being! At least that is what they tell us. If we question what the FEDS do, aren’t we the ones in the wrong? A little at a time, that is what it is. They will feed us bit and pieces, for our own good, we will appreciate it. They will slowly take the power away from our Sheriffs in each county, one county at a time. They are the ones with the power at the moment, but most people do NOT know this. Once they, the FEDS, step in and take over, we have no one left to fight for us. I think people need to read up on what are Sheriffs can actually do. End of story.

        Liked by 1 person

      • March 14, 2015 2:30 pm

        I used these quotes yesterday regarding John Brennan’s fear that social media is aiding terrorism. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/13/john-brennan-cia-director-social-media-greatly-amp/#comment-1907167320

        It fits in this situation, too:

        “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”

        Also translated as:

        “I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.”

        Yes, a little at a time. We are in a pot of water with the heat slowly being turned up.

        Liked by 1 person

      • March 14, 2015 7:19 pm

        We know what Franklin said about giving up liberty for safety…

        Like

      • March 14, 2015 7:21 pm

        “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”
        Also translated as:
        “I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.”

        Laura, the Latin phase I use as my signature at the end of my posts is roughly translated to those two quotes. It seems we are on the same page!

        Liked by 1 person

      • March 14, 2015 7:24 pm

        Haha, I just noticed that, Steve. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

    • March 14, 2015 7:18 pm

      Very troubling especially in the light of Holder saying he was considering disbanding the Ferguson police department, where is the hell do they think they get this right!? The quote in my header image, which was made by James Madison, comes to mind here…

      Like

      • March 14, 2015 7:28 pm

        The answer is that they don’t have the authority. However, like the rest of the government – SCOTUS and Congress – the executive branch believes it can expand its authority anytime it wants.

        Liked by 1 person

      • March 14, 2015 7:40 pm

        And until we are able to stop them I suppose I can understand how they feel this way. We allow them to get away with it so naturally they are going to push the limits.

        Like

Leave a comment