Skip to content

IRS to return $100,000 wrongfully seized from small business owner

May 15, 2015

    Back in October of last year America’s Watchtower reported on the story that the IRS was in the process of seizing  the bank accounts of some small business owners even though they were never charged with committing any crime. The IRS began targeting small business owners who made multiple deposits of under $10,000 each and the agency justified it by using a law which prohibits “structured” deposits. This law was supposed to be used to thwart drug dealers and gun traffickers but these were legitimate businesses. A clear abuse of power in my opinion.

  Here is one example:

For almost 40 years, Carole Hinders has dished out Mexican specialties at her modest cash-only restaurant. For just as long, she deposited the earnings at a small bank branch a block away — until last year, when two tax agents knocked on her door and informed her that they had seized her checking account, almost $33,000.

The Internal Revenue Service agents did not accuse Ms. Hinders of money laundering or cheating on her taxes — in fact, she has not been charged with any crime. Instead, the money was seized solely because she had deposited less than $10,000 at a time, which they viewed as an attempt to avoid triggering a required government report.

  And here is another:

Mr. Sowers is a dairy farmer who makes quite a bit of his money from participating in farmer’s markets. Because of the business he is in he frequently deposits cash into his bank account on a weekly basis.

 According to Randy Sowers his wife went into the bank one Monday with $12,000 and wanted to deposit it but the bank teller asked her to make the deposits less than $10,000 to save the bank paperwork. That is when all hell broke loose.

  Because the Sowers’ followed the bank’s advice they were making weekly “structured” deposits of under $10,000 and they were visited by the IRS. Eventually the criminal agency seized $62,000 of their money. They eventually settled with the IRS for just under $30,000 but that means the IRS is still in possession of $32,000 which rightfully belongs to the Sowers family.

  A third such case is the story of Lyndon McLellan. He owns a convenience store and because he made what the IRS deemed to be “structured” deposits the criminal agency stole $107,702.66 of his hard-earned money. But this story has a happy ending: the IRS is going to give him his money back.

“It’s a relief to know that you’re getting something back that’s yours to start with,” McLellan told The Daily Signal. “I wanted [the government] to do what was right, and I felt what was right was for me to get my money back.”

“We’re thrilled that the government has recognized that what they were doing to Lyndon was wrong and that they’ve dropped the attempt to forfeit Lyndon’s money,” Robert Johnson, a lawyer at the Institute for Justice who represents McLellan, told The Daily Signal. “This case was a mistake and unconstitutional from the start, and we’re just glad the government has recognized that.”

  However, the IRS stole this money almost one year ago and it could be months before the criminal agency makes the payment so it would seem to me Lyndon McLellan is also due the interest he lost while his money was in the hands of this corrupt agency.

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

12 Comments leave one →
  1. Father Athanasius's avatar
    Father Paul Lemmen permalink
    May 15, 2015 8:36 pm

    Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Laura Bernard Mielcarek's avatar
    May 15, 2015 9:10 pm

    Civil asset forfeiture is an obscene violation of several Constitutionally protected Rights! This makes my blood boil, I get so upset reading about these incidences!!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      May 16, 2015 5:40 am

      It sure is Laura! And in many cases they do not even bother to try making it look okay by charging them with a crime.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Laura Bernard Mielcarek's avatar
        May 16, 2015 9:35 am

        I’ve read some appalling stories, Steve, stories that would make you weep! The government actually thinks it’s entitled to take this money! I don’t know of words stronger than obscene or despicable to describe this behavior. Our new US Attorney General is in favor of this atrocious practice!!!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        May 16, 2015 4:02 pm

        The government seems to believe all the money belongs to them and they alone should decide who get how much, it is beyond frustrating! Why am I not surprised the new AG would be in favor of this?

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Dr. Jeff's avatar
    Dr. Jeff permalink
    May 16, 2015 3:31 am

    It never should have happened.

    If there are no criminal issues, assets of any kind should remain untouched. Even then, no seizure without a solid conviction.

    The Feds are also using other marginal crimes to seize houses. It wasn’t that long ago that there was a case where some kid gets caught in a driveway with a joint and the house gets seized under some dumb anti drug law. IIRC the owners kept their house, but it was a nasty legal fight.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      May 16, 2015 5:42 am

      I hadn’t heard that story Dr. Jeff but that is criminal! These are the people who should be in jail! How can they possibly justify stealing money without charges!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Laura Bernard Mielcarek's avatar
      May 16, 2015 9:42 am

      It’s beyond description, Dr. J. I read one account of an apartment complex owner who lost the complex because a tenant was dealing drugs; another warehouse owner lost the warehouse because the renter stored/was dealing drugs there.

      People have no idea what this unconstitutional, obscene, insane war on drugs has truly cost our society!!

      Police departments don’t want to give up civil asset forfeiture because much of their budgets come from this illegal practice. Some departments actually claim they wouldn’t be able to function without these stolen monies.

      I really get upset about this, in case you couldn’t tell…. 😉

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Dr. Jeff's avatar
    Dr. Jeff permalink
    May 16, 2015 6:54 pm

    Laura, you’re absolutely right.

    It goes on and on. It includes everything from travelers going across the country having their cash and even their cars confiscated, to major seizures of real estate. There is even at least one death (Ventura County, CA, about 20 years ago) due to the laws.

    There are two particular points of interest here.

    The first is that no politician of either party has ever so much as suggested shutting down the civil asset forfeiture laws. It’s just too rich a source of revenue. Imagine, the police can legally steal from the people and keep what they take (Well, as long as they give the Feds their split.)!

    The second is that all of this is the result of the War On Drugs. There have been several notable results from the WOD. The first is that we’re supporting a huge prison population. Then there’s the rise of thug culture in our inner cities. At the same time, the WOD has been a total failure. After 40+ years of anti drug efforts, there is literally no one in the entire U.S. who is more than a couple of phone calls away from getting any illegal drug imaginable. It’s a complete failure.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to Laura Bernard Mielcarek Cancel reply