Skip to content
Advertisements

The Daily Beast: ISIS analysis was altered to present a more favorable report to the American people

September 21, 2015

  The Daily Beast, which by no means can be considered a right-wing news outlet, has released a new report in which it claims the official analysis on the effectiveness of Barack Obama’s ISIS strategy was altered in order to present a more rosy picture to the American people about the effort–and it was done at the request of CENTCOM.

  Here is more:

Senior intelligence officials at the U.S. military’s Central Command demanded significant alterations to analysts’ reports that questioned whether airstrikes against the so-called Islamic State widely known as ISIS were damaging the group’s finances and its ability to launch attacks. But reports that showed the group being weakened by the U.S.-led air campaign received comparatively little scrutiny, The Daily Beast has learned.

Senior CENTCOM intelligence officials who reviewed the critical reports sent them back to the analysts and ordered them to write new versions that included more footnotes and details to support their assessments, according to two officials familiar with a complaint levied by more than 50 analysts about intelligence manipulation by CENTCOM higher-ups.

In some cases, analysts were also urged to state that killing particular ISIS leaders and key officials would diminish the group and lead to its collapse. Many analysts, however, didn’t believe that simply taking out top ISIS leaders would have an enduring effect on overall operations.

“There was the reality on the ground but it was not as rosy as [the leadership] wanted it to be,” a defense official familiar with the complaint told The Daily Beast. “The challenge was assessing whether the glass was half empty, not half full.”

  But some feel it was not a request at all but rather a demand:

Some analysts have also complained that they felt “bullied” into reaching conclusions favored by their bosses, two separate sources familiar with analysts’ complaints said. The written and verbal pressure created a climate at CENTCOM in which analysts felt they had to self-censor some of their reports.

Some of the analysts have also accused their bosses of changing the reports in order to appeal to what they perceived as the Obama administration’s official line that the anti-ISIS campaign was making progress and would eventually end with the group’s destruction.

   If this sounds vaguely familiar to you it should because there is a precedent here: the Benghazi talking points were actually edited 12 times with input from Hillary Clinton’s State Department before they finally settled on the final version of the story the regime had Susan Rice present to the American people before the last Presidential election.

  Some things never change…

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

Advertisements
3 Comments leave one →
  1. September 21, 2015 7:06 pm

    Change the facts to fit obama’s narrative….

    Liked by 1 person

    • September 21, 2015 7:46 pm

      Yep!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. September 22, 2015 4:46 am

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: