Skip to content
Advertisements

Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin was assistant editor for a radical Muslim journal which wrote against gay couples and claimed some women are “asking to be raped”

August 22, 2016

  Two of the major issues Hillary Clinton is campaigning on are women’s rights and LGBT rights, however it turns out the former Secretary of State’s most trusted adviser, Huma Abedin, was the assistant editor for a radical Muslim journal which often expressed a contrary and inflammatory position on these issues, in addition to blaming the United States for the September 11th terrorist attack. (In the interest of clarity I am using the term radical as a qualifying adjective to distinguish between extremist Muslims and moderate Muslims, I am no way suggesting that all Muslims are radicals. I feel this should go without saying however there seems to be a general lack of reading comprehension in the United States, at least on this issue with the left, because every time I use the term I am accused of lumping them all together.)

  Here is more:

Human Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s longest and reportedly most loyal aide, served as assistant editor at a radical Muslim journal for twelve years. The journal defended Saudi Arabia’s treatment of women and, while Abedin edited the publication, an article called the United States’ actions in the Middle East a “time bomb” leading up to the September 11, 2001 attacks.

The article blamed the United States’ “spiral of violence” for “building up intense anger and hostility within the pressure cooker,” which was strengthened by “various kinds of injustices and sanctions.” This created a “time bomb that had to explode and explode it did on September 11, changing in its wake the life and times of the very community and the people it aimed to serve,” the article read, according to the  New York Post.

  Here is more about the journal’s position on how western women are asking to be raped:

“the journal ran an article headlined “Women’s Rights Are Islamic Rights.” The article attacked a broad range of liberal and feminist ideas, from homosexuality to more revealing dress and even women in the workforce.

“Pushing [mothers] out into the open labor market is a clear demonstration of a lack of respect for womanhood and motherhood,” the article declared. It added that less modest clothing ushered in by women’s liberation “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” The Post‘s Paul Sperry summarized this, writing, “In other words, sexually liberated women are just asking to be raped.”

  Here is what the journal said about single moms and gay couples who adopt:

The article also argued that single moms, working mothers, and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families: “A conjugal family established through a marriage contract between a man and a woman, and extended through procreation is the only definition of family a Muslim can accept.” A Saudi official with the Muslim World League authored the article, and JMMA was founded and funded by the former head of the Muslim World League.

  Christians in America have been under assault for espousing traditional family values and Hillary Clinton has been a leading voice in this attack as well as labeling the right misogynists. Remember the justified outrage when Todd Aiken talked about “legitimate rape” and women being able to will away pregnancy?

 Yet Hillary Clinton’s top aide was assistant editor of a journal which basically claimed some women were responsible for being raped and the former Secretary of State is defending Huma Abedin

My understanding is that her name was simply listed on the masthead in that period,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said hours after The Post broke the bombshell story. “She did not play a role in editing at the publication.”

  Even if we grant this point and willingly suspend disbelief and admit Huma Abedin did not actually do anything while being an assistant editor for the radical journal it would seem to me that she was in agreement with what the journal was writing. Why else would she be associated with the journal and allow her name to be used all those years?

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

Advertisements
17 Comments leave one →
  1. August 23, 2016 12:54 am

    Huma’s father founded the Institute of Minority Muslim Affairs, (IMMA.co.uk) and its publishes the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. After Huma’s father died her mother Saleha Mahmood Abedin took over the Journal. Humas’s sister and brother are also involved with the Institute and the Journal.

    Congresswomen Bachman was thwarted in her efforts to raise concerns about Huma by John McCain. Why?

    What passports does Huma have? She was born in the US to alien parents. Her father was Indian and her mother is Pakistani. The family moved to Saudia Arabia when she was 2. She returned to the US to attend university. What was her student status and who paid for her education?

    Liked by 1 person

    • August 23, 2016 5:35 am

      I didn’t know all that about her parents, thanks for sharing. There are many questions which need to be answered but nobody is asking the questions.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. August 23, 2016 9:45 am

    According to shoebat.com Huma’s father Syed Abedin wrote a document for the rulers of Saudi Arabia which became their blueprint for spreading Islam to the rest of the world and the IMMA is their front. Huma is essentially a solider in this global plan of Islamification. The House of Saud owns the Clintons and they will call in their chits when Hillary is elected.

    Liked by 1 person

    • August 23, 2016 7:11 pm

      Looks like we have a fifth columnist who is about to be right next to the next President advising her!

      Like

  3. August 23, 2016 11:40 am

    Here’s something emailed to me recently to go right w/ this:

    Warning: graphic and shocking.

    Liked by 2 people

    • August 23, 2016 1:18 pm

      Wow…that turned my stomach. Hillary is so evil!!!

      Liked by 2 people

      • August 23, 2016 1:46 pm

        Yep, and that was back then! So many more years later of hardening, she’s progressed even further into that darkness. There’s a warning: ‘Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness.’ Luke 11:35 Jesus talking to the Pharisees: But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness! Matt 6:23 Dark lights grows strange things.

        Liked by 2 people

      • August 23, 2016 4:26 pm

        The darkness is DEEP my friend, very deep… 😦

        Liked by 2 people

      • August 23, 2016 7:16 pm

        I hate to call anyone evil but how else can you describe this?!

        Liked by 2 people

      • August 23, 2016 7:21 pm

        She may well be the first person I have actually called evil. I usually reserve that right to God…who am I? But you are right…what else could we call her?

        Liked by 2 people

    • August 23, 2016 7:15 pm

      I heard about this story and how Hillary laughed about it but I had not heard how she got him off. Absolutely sickening!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. August 23, 2016 2:37 pm

    And Huma a devout Muslim is married to a pervert Jew. Makes no sense at all. He was an up and coming politico that gave her entree into the halls of power. How well she has done. I suggest Huma is more dangerous than Hillary. And by the looks of it, was running the state department. Of course with her Iranian born buddy Val Jar. Throw in Kerry whose daughter’s in-laws are in Iran…….

    Liked by 1 person

    • August 23, 2016 7:16 pm

      The fifth column is in place and the next four years could be very scary!

      Liked by 1 person

    • August 23, 2016 7:55 pm

      I am no expert, but what I have read about Islam makes it a very complicated theology. There are rules that allow members to break the rules if it is with the intent of advancing Islam. Huma can marry a Jew if it was to advance the spread of Islam. What is most telling is her mother and brother have not denounced her. This would indicate there is a higher goal involved.

      Liked by 2 people

      • August 23, 2016 8:41 pm

        Agree entirely. In fact supports the fact that she is a wolf is sheep’s clothes. How many have already lost their lives because of her? The two of them sure were anxious to get the Muslim Brotherhood set up in Egypt.

        Liked by 1 person

      • August 24, 2016 5:39 am

        They are also allowed to lie if it spreads the ideology!

        Like

  5. August 24, 2016 8:06 am

    They SHOULD NOT be allowed in this country since Islam is contrary to our principals of freedom and justice. They are incapable of integrating and want instead to impose their beliefs on us.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: