Skip to content

The FBI found 30 pages of documents related to the Clinton/Lynch airport tarmac meeting

October 13, 2017

  Judicial Watch has been trying to get the FBI to release documents related to the infamous Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch airport tarmac meeting which occurred just days before James Comey decided to exonerate Hillary Clinton even though he basically admitted she was guilty. Previously the FBI determined they had no such documents, until another related lawsuit pushed by Judicial Watch came along and caught the FBI in a lie and the agency had to admit there might be such documents after all:

The FBI originally informed Judicial Watch they did not locate any records related to the tarmac meeting.  However, in a related case, the Justice Department located emails in which Justice Department officials communicated with the FBI and wrote that they had communicated with the FBI.  As a result, by letter dated August 10, 2017, from the FBI stated, “Upon further review, we subsequently determined potentially responsive documents may exist. As a result, your [FOIA] request has been reopened…”

  According to this story, the FBI has informed Judicial Watch that they have indeed found 30 pages of documents related to the tarmac meeting and would like 6 weeks to turn them over.

Judicial Watch was informed yesterday by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that the FBI has located 30 pages of documents related to the June 27, 2016, tarmac meeting between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton, and proposes non-exempt material be produced no later than November 30, 2017 (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:16-cv-02046)).

  Why does the FBI need 6 more weeks before they can turn over these documents when they have been stonewalling this request of so long? Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch is wondering the same thing:

“The FBI is out of control. It is stunning that the FBI ‘found’ these Clinton-Lynch tarmac records only after we caught the agency hiding them in another lawsuit,” stated Judicial Watch Tom Fitton. “Judicial Watch will continue to press for answers about the FBI’s document games in court. In the meantime, the FBI should stop the stonewall and release these new records immediately.”

  Not that it really matters at this point but I still want to know what was being talked about between Barack Obama’s Department of Injustice, the Clinton’s, and the FBI during this investigation during the time period James Comey was exonerating, “un-exonerating,” and  “re-exonerating” Hillary Clinton.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

12 Comments leave one →
  1. Fergus permalink
    October 13, 2017 8:04 pm

    Yoga pants?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. October 13, 2017 8:23 pm

    This has nothing to do with the Russian investigation… I know I am a broken record, but I am really sick of Session’s non stop talk about immigration while he doesn’t hold any feet to the fire in getting to the bottom of this stuff. I am almost starting to wonder…..why…. Judicial watch is doing a yeoman’s job and finding with some luck decent Judges to follow up on this stuff.

    Liked by 1 person

    • October 14, 2017 7:26 am

      I know how you feel, I often feel like a broken record as well on several issues! It is so frustrating to see what was going on and to know nothing is going to happen to these people.


  3. October 14, 2017 12:50 am

    Seems the criminals are in control. What to do about that? That ‘tarmac meeting’ was one of how many that weren’t “found out”. We need more “good guys” and few ‘bad’.

    Liked by 1 person

    • October 14, 2017 7:28 am

      We only know about this meeting because they got a little sloppy and a local station covered it. You ask a great question, just imagine how often this happens that we don’t know about.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Brittius permalink
    October 14, 2017 3:43 am

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Dr. Jeff permalink
    October 14, 2017 4:36 pm

    This is roughly reason #843 as to why I will never trust our government. My list began when LBJ’s Credibility Gap became known.

    It’s also the reason I want the powers of our government severely limited.

    I may have some amount of trust that an administration may have our best interests at heart, but I also know that we will have a new administration every 4 to 8 years. In the 10 administrations since the death of JFK, I have had partial trust in 3 or 4 of them, and the rest, not at all.

    When the Libs increase the power of government, they never stop to think that there may be a Conservative government in the future. They never consider that greater power usually leads to greater abuse. I don’t mind if they’re terminally stupid, I just don’t want to be taken on their ride.

    Liked by 1 person

    • October 14, 2017 6:03 pm

      The reasons keep piling up, don’t they?
      The latest example of the left not thinking about the future when they did something was probably when Harry Reid ended the judicial filibuster. Trump is now filling the courts because of this.



  1. Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: