Skip to content

New York Times authors of Kavanaugh article claim the editors removed crucial information

September 17, 2019

  Over the weekend several of the Democratic Presidential candidates made fools out of themselves (and they were not the only ones) by calling for the impeachment of Brett Kavanaugh based on a spurious hit piece put out by the New York Times.

 It turned out the woman in the story has no recollection of the event described in the article–which relied on the second-hand account of a person with ties to Hillary Clinton–and the paper had to backtrack from the story.

  How could the once reputable paper screw up so badly other than the fact they wanted the story to be true so much that they were willing to run with an uncorroborated story? That is one way, but there are other possibilities; what if the paper did not care whether or not the story was true? What if the paper went out of its way to libel a Supreme Court Justice?

  That is beginning to sound like the case because it is now being reported that the authors of this story claim they wrote that the victim had no recollection of the alleged incident which supposedly scarred her for life, but that the editors decided that was not pertinent information that the public needed to know.

  And liberals wonder why the people no longer trust the mainstream media…or the reactionary, vindictive Democrats for that matter.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

8 Comments leave one →
  1. MaddMedic permalink
    September 17, 2019 8:28 pm

    I wouldn’t let my dog crap on the NYT…
    Not that he would ever have the chance!!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. September 18, 2019 4:27 pm

    Excuse me while I take a rant…..was I dreaming? There was a hearing with IG Horowitz. It was not covered on any c–span channels, cable Fox… Nothing… I finally caught up with it live on youtube. Devastating on Comey.. I am still watching Fox and still not one word on the hearing…

    Liked by 2 people

    • September 18, 2019 6:46 pm

      This is the first I have heard of it and I share your frustration! Fox is pretty much gone as well.

      Liked by 1 person

      • September 18, 2019 6:48 pm

        Horowitz sent over a criminal refer on comey… no dems attended..,still nothing on fox..its on youtube if one checks around for it one hour 20 minutes/
        We have been waiting forever to hear from Horowitz

        Liked by 2 people

      • September 19, 2019 7:02 pm

        Sadly Barr is part of the establishment and it looks like he is adverse to prosecuting any of the establishment.


  3. September 18, 2019 6:59 pm

    NYT’s comes thru again.
    When criminals are trying to get back their control they’ll do anything and everything.
    Well ‘whom ever they attack’ shows “who to keep in!”
    We’ve yet to have real proof Ruth is really alive – and not a double or hologram 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: