The Democrats have delayed Alberto Gonzales’ testimony in the made up controversy that is the US attorney firings. The white house had wanted to move the hearings up to get them over with. The Democrats denied that request. The white house knows he did nothing wrong, so they want to put it in the past and get on with business. Now they have delayed the original date.
The reason I believe they did this was to drag out the trumped up controversy. They know no wrong act was committed here, they have even admitted it. But they know that Americans who don’t pay close attention to politics will be listening and they hope to make them believe criminal activity took place here. The longer they can drag this out, the more they believe it hurts the president, and that’s the true goal.
The Democrats are in no hurry to show the country nothing wrong happened here, they are just interested in making the administration look bad.
The Democrat’s Surge
This is a very good article about the Democrats possibly hanging themselves out to dry with their anti-Iraq war policy.
The funny thing here is that the Democrats voted for Gen. David Petraeus to be the new head in the Iraq war knowing full well he supported the surge. If they didn’t agree with him they should have voted against him.This leads to the question, did they vote for him just so they could oppose the surge if it went bad? This would further their attempt to embarrass the president. While at the same time knowing if the surge worked they could spin this into a victory for them.
New Hampshire House Passes A Bigoted Civil Unions Bill
The New Hampshire house has passed a civil unions bill. This bill is bigoted and writes discrimination into law, to use the liberal’s terms. You must be wondering how a bill that allows homosexuals the same rights as married couples can be discriminatory.
I’ll explain, this bill has language in it that bans civil unions, as current marriage laws do, between uncles and nephews, aunts and nieces and first cousins. What gives them the right to stop these people from the rights other hetero and homosexual couples enjoy?
I thought these incestuous practices were banned because of possible birth defects in the offspring of such relationships. If this is true, than why can’t homosexuals marry family members? There are no biological birth defects to worry about.
Could it be that they are afraid it will lead to legalizing hetero sexual incest marriages? If that’s the case, who are we to say that’s wrong? They are only loving couples who happen to be related.
And the ball will keep rolling from there. That is my whole problem with the gay marriage issue. When the definition of marriage is changed once these groups will keep pushing until all forms of marriages are allowed.
These groups, such as the polygamists, pedophiles,and others will only be emboldened to push for their rights to marriage. They may be laughed at at first, but liberals never stop and they will keep pushing the agenda for years. Public opposition will eventually be eroded and in the end they will win.
It has to stop somewhere, but if you ask a liberal, we can’t legislate morality so how can we say where it stops? Who has the right to stop these other forms of marriage?
Nancy Pelosi Lies To Syria, Angers Israel
Nancy Pelosi went to a terrorist state, and enemy of the United States, and did what Democrats do best. She made promises she can’t, and has no intentions to, keep.
She told Syria that Israel was ready to negotiate peace. The only problem is, it was a lie. She either did this intentionally to try and embarrass the president, or she is just foolish and naive. Either way she made a huge blunder this week, and her mistakes just keep piling up. What she did manage to do was anger our biggest ally in the middle east, Israel.
You can read an opinion piece about this here, or you can read about all of her missteps here.
Al Gore Challenged To Global Warming Debate
Here are two excerpts from this article.
Gore has not accepted Monckton’s challenge to debate and is unlikely to do so.
“He says the debate is over,” Van Winkle said of Gore, “and we don’t necessarily feel the public has ever really been given the debate. His interest [in accepting the challenge] would be … giving the public the serious and measured discussion that they need to make a good decision about public policy.”
Al Gore has been challenged to debate man-made global warming. He will never do this, I wish he would because I think it would be a great debate. The problem is he doesn’t want to take the chance that he will be proven a fraud. He has declared that global warming is a scientific fact, even though the articles that we readoften say global warming has a scientific consensus. If scientists only have a consensus, then it isn’t a proven scientific fact.
After losing his presidential bid he needed something to fill the void he felt in his life. This issue has given him a new cause to believe in and to stay in the public eye.
He won’t take any chances on losing this race also.
Jimmy Carter Endorses Nancy Pelosi’s Visit To Syria
I feel much better now that I know Jimmy Carter endorses Nancy Pelosi’s trip to one of our enemies. Just knowing that one of the worst presidents in US history is on her side, I know I am on the right side of this issue. Jimmy Carter is the last person in this country who should talk about foreign policy. Bill Clinton is next, after giving away our nuclear secrets.
Of course Democrats have a long history of coddling dictators. They envy the power that dictators are able to maintain over their people. Democrats are socialists at heart and that is only one step away from communism.
This is a piece written by Michelle Malken. In it she describes how some schools are holding mock terrorism drills. Sounds like a good idea, doesn’t it? We can gauge our preparedness for such an event. The only problem is that political correctness has crept into them. Instead of radical Muslims they are using wacko homeschoolers, and radical right wing Christian Republicans. What is wrong in this country when you can’t call the terrorists what they are? I don’t know if this is being done for PC reasons,or if it is just another attack on Christianity. Christianity is the only religion that it is okay to attack.
Look what this type of appeasement has led to in Europe. A judge in Belgium ruled a Muslim man could beat his wife because it was in the Koran. This is sharia law, and it is now legally practiced in a non Muslim country.
England cannot fly her flag at Heathro airport, or over prisons so they won’t offend Muslims.
England is starting the process of eliminating the teaching of the Holocaust to not offend Muslims. They have changed the title of Three Little Pigs.
This type of stuff happens in Europe first, but eventually spreads over here. Muslims who intentionally mimicked the 9/11 hijackers are now suing the vigilant citizens who reported them.
We need to Wake Up America.
The Media And Impending Doom
Here is an interesting article that discusses how the media promote one crisis after another in an attempt to make the people fearful. From the bird flu, to global warming these impending disasters are predicted but never come true. Even last year we were told it would be the biggest hurricane seasons ever. It was one of the weakest.
They always seem to be wrong with their fear-mongering, yet they continue to predict one disaster or epidemic after another. If it bleeds, it leads is the age old expression, but now it seems to be if it might bleed, it leads.
Is this a ploy for ratings? Is it an attempt to keep the American people in fear? I don’t know, but I found some of the facts in the article interesting.
As you can see here,Sen.Dianne Feinstein is denying any wrongdoing in her role on the senate subcommittee on military construction appropriation. Now, shouldn’t the Democrats follow the precedent they are setting with Alberto Gonzalez? They admitted no wrong was committed by the firing of the attorneys, but want to hold hearings anyway, just to try and nail someone on a perjury charge.
So, even if Sen. Feinstein has committed no wrongdoing, she needs to be investigated.
Democrats Trying To Ban The Term War On Terror
As first reported on gopbloggers, the Democrats are trying to do away with the term war on terror. Unbelievable,I’m not even going to justify this with any commentary, you can read about it here.
