A New PAC Forms to Fight Hillary…..By Liberal Democrats
A new political action committee has been formed to fight against Hillary Clinton. What is shocking about this new PAC is who it is that has formed it. Liberal Democrats who feel Hillary isn’t liberal enough for them. Now that is a scary thought, isn’t it?
“We think there are other Democratic presidential candidates who are both more progressive and have a better chance of beating the Republicans than she does,” said the president of Democratic Courage, Glenn Hurowitz.
I can understand their apprehension about Hillary not being able to beat the Republican nominee, because her negatives are so high, and she is polarizing and could be the one candidate that motivates the Republican voters against her, but her liberal, I mean progressive credentials aren’t strong enough?
Who is this group endorsing?
He declined to tip his hand on the group’s case against Clinton, but said the PAC plans a paid media campaign in the early primary states to make its position clear.
“We have no plans right now to back any particular candidate,” Hurowitz said.
We don’t know yet, I would speculate Obama, that’s not really going out on a limb though, is it?
Once the ads start appearing here in New Hampshire I will try to update everyone on who they are endorsing, and what the ads contain.
Read the article this post was based on here.
America's Watchtower 
Not liberal enough? Who are these people, anyway? Hillary Clinton is scary. Very scary. Not just because she is a bad person that make the hair on the back of my neck stand up, but because she rivals Joseph Stalin as far as being a left-wing lunatic. For liberals in the US to claim that she isn’t liberal enough is a very, very frightening thing. Why don’t they just stop the joking and stop calling themselves democrats and be truthful about the fact that they want to run a communist (or at least a far-left socialist) under the democrat name? These people are crazy. At what point did they lose track of what the democratic party was all about and decide to blend the left all the way from the center to full-on communist and call it “democrat?”
This is what I fear so much. If the wrong people get power, this is what we have to expect. We’ve already seen it in congress. The “democrats” that the people blindly voted in under the guise of ending the Iraq war are proving to have as much in common with the democrat party as I do! They are unhinged, far-left extremists who are intent on leaving the American people behind while pursuing their own socialist, single-world government, koombiya bullshit agendas. Can you imagine what would happen if we didn’t have the check of a Republican controlled executive branch? I shudder to think… So does my wallet. Yikes!
LikeLike
Incredible!! HRC is 100% Liberal, but just pandering to the masses to get elected.
And I agree with arclightzero – these people are nuts!!
Note: I’ve moved my blog from Tom’s Common Sense to Tom’s Fireside Chat. Please change your blogroll and visit sometime. Thanks!
LikeLike
These people are definately socialists, they do border on being communists. I don’t like to use the “C” word too often as people think you are just spouting off when you call someone a commie, but I do once in a while, and, they ARE.
I am scared to death of where this country may go if Democrats gain the presidency and a larger majority in congress.
Tom, thanks for the heads up on your new blog, I will check it out.
LikeLike
Bah, I love using the “c” word. It makes me smile. Especially when I get to call somebody a “pinko commie bastard” although that doesn’t happen nearly as often as it should.
The problem is that they are erring awfully close to communism in their ways of thinking. I was pondering this last night while reading about their proposed tax increases. It makes me think that the only way small businesses would be able to survive in the “new democratic order” would be to stop being private businesses and simply operate as part of the state. After all, the proposal means that top tier tax payers (i.e. successful small business owners) would have to pay nearly 50% tax at the federal level alone. At that rate, since most of your money is going into government, why even be private? It would seem that you’re just operating as a government entity to provide revenue.
In reality, isn’t that what communism was all about? Businesses weren’t private. They operated as part of the government, and in turn the government provided to the people. Is this really the road that the dems want us to go down? It really is starting to look that way, isn’t it? When business is taxed beyond reason so the government has trhe revenue to fund social programs and provide to the people, isn’t that the basic foundation of communism?
LikeLike
They are pinko commie bastards, WOW, that did feel good!
Communism played off of the whole class envy angle also, and that is a game the libs love to play. This tax increase would hurt the small buisnesses the most, as you said. Many of them would be forced to close, meaning workers would lose their jobs. The small buisnesses that survived, along with the big buisnesses would not be paying the tax increases, they would pass the taxes on to the working families. When the price of buisness goes up, so does the price of the goods and services.
So not only would these tax increases cost many workers their jobs, they would also cause an increase in the price of many items.
Does that sound like a wise proposal? I don’t think so. The problem is that many people hear the Dems say they are going to tax the rich and they say “yeah, screw the rich” and don’t stop to think of the consequences that we will endure. Too many people just follow the rhetoric, and we will all pay in the long run.
SCREW THOSE PINKO COMMIES!
LikeLike