Gunrunner: Did the Obama regime grant the Sinaloa drug cartel immunity and allow drugs to be walked into the United States?
Jesus Zambada-Niebla is a member of the Sinaloa drug cartel who is sitting in jail awaiting trial on drug trafficking charges. He contends that he–and the Sinaloa drug cartel—was granted immunity by the federal government as part of Operation Fast and Furious and has requested that the Department of “Justice” release documents which would prove his claim and aid his defense.
He claims that the United States government not only allowed guns to walk into Mexico, but also sold the weapons to the drug cartel and allowed them to keep operating in the United States with immunity in return for information on smaller drug cartels:
Mr. Zambada-Niebla believes that the documentation that he requests will confirm that the weapons received by Sinaloa Cartel members and its leaders in Operation ‘Fast & Furious’ were provided under the agreement entered into between the United States government and [a Mexican lawyer] on behalf of the Sinaloa Cartel that is the subject of his defense …,” it said.
“Mr. Zambada-Niebla believes that the documentation will also provide evidence showing that the United States government has a policy and pattern of providing benefits, including immunity, to cartel leaders, including the Sinaloa Cartel and their members, who are willing to provide information against rival drug cartels
Normally I would question the credibility and the validity of a claim made against the United States government by a man who is a member of a gun running, drug trafficking, criminal organization as a man who is obviously lying in order to protect his ass, but it must be remembered that Eric Holder is also a member of a gun running, drug trafficking, criminal organization who is lying in order to protect his own ass as well and it lends Jesus Zambada-Niebla instant credibility in my opinion.
Before Operation Fast and Furious was even begun Hillary Clinton tried to promote the 90% lie as proof that the blame for the violence at the Mexican border lies at the feet of American citizens, and Fast and Furious was begun as an attempt to “prove” this lie.
This new revelation ties in nicely with Hillary Clinton’s attempt to place the blame for the violence on the American people for it must be remembered that she claimed Americans “insatiable demand for illicit drugs“ was the reason for drug trafficking in the first place. Not only was the United States government willing to sell guns to Mexican drug lords in an attempt to prove the lie and implement an assault weapons ban and also gain support for the United Nations small arms treaty, but it also appears they were willing to grant immunity to one of the largest drug cartels to ensure that drugs would continue to flow into the country in order to prove that Americans’ demand for drugs was the root cause for the violence in the first place.
Normally law enforcement will grant immunity to “smaller fish” in a criminal enterprise if they are willing to help the federal government get to the “larger fish” but in this case the federal government appears to have granted immunity to a “larger fish” in order to get information on the “smaller fish” and this makes no sence unless there was an ulterior motive involved. And in this case the motive appears to have been to allow weapons to walk into Mexico and drugs to be walked into the United States in an effort to justify cracking down on the second amendment.
The United States could not justify cracking down on the second amendment if the drug supply dried up in the United States so they entered a pact which would ensure drugs continued to flow into the country as they provided weapons to the most dangerous Mexican criminals, and we are left to ask this: Which side is the Obama regime really on?
The answer to that question lies in the documents that Jesus Zambada-Niebla has requested but Eric Holder has refused to release the documents and we can only speculate as to the reason why, but it certainly appears as if Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, and Janet Napolitano are not on our side.