Sandra Fluke hired a public relations firm headed by Anita Dunn
It is becoming quite obvious that Sandra Fluke is a political plant designed to advance the leftist agenda, and if it weren’t for Rush Limbaugh the left’s plan would have failed and she would still he languishing in political irrelevance. Sandra Fluke isn’t the innocent young lady the left would have us believe she is.
Sandra Fluke is a 30 year old WOMAN who chose to go to Georgetown University specifically because this institute of higher learning did not offer birth control, and as a lifelong activist she chose to go there with the purpose of making birth control a national issue. What a remarkable stroke of luck for Ms. Fluke that this just happened to coincide with the Obama regime’s assault on religious freedom. Or maybe not.
This has been a coordinated effort between the White House and the media from the very beginning. During a debate in January George Stephanopoulos first brought birth control to the national stage when he asked Mitt Romney if states had the right to ban birth control. A clearly bewildered Mitt Romney asked Stephanopoulos why he was asking this question when nobody was trying to ban birth control. Little did Mitt Romney know at the time that Stephanopoulos probably had inside information and most likely he knew the birth control mandate was coming. He was setting the stage for what was to come and was trying to trap Mitt Romney into giving him a soundbite for the controversy which was soon to follow.
Mitt Romney did not fall into the trap, but the man who ties half of his brain behind his back to make it fair–Rush Limbaugh–did fall into the trap when the left introduced Sandra Fluke into the scene. Rush Limbaugh called Sandra Fluke a slut and asked her to produce a sex tape so that he could “get something” out of paying for her birth control. This gave the left the ammunition they were looking for when Stephanopoulos tried to set up Romney and they took full advantage of it.
But this is where a connection between Sandra Fluke and the White House starts to come to light. Sandra Fluke started making the media rounds, and when she appeared on “The View” to tell the world how hurt she was by Rush Limbaugh’s words, and push this fictitious Republican war on women she began promoting Media Matters.
Why Media Matters?
As we learned from a series of articles on The Daily Caller, Media Matters (which once falsely labeled America’s Watchtower as a militia website) is nothing more than a division of the Ministry of Propaganda and has been coordinating with the Obama regime for the last three years. It is no secret that Media Matters is not a non-biased news organization, and in fact they never claimed to be, but it turns out they are nothing more than an extension of the Obama regime working closely with the regime to control the message. So it is quite telling that Sandra Fluke would promote the propaganda organ of the Obama regime while on national television.
But there appears to be another connection between Sandra Fluke and the White House which is also just now coming to light. Sandra Fluke is being represented by a public relations firm called SKDKnickerbocker, and this firm just happens to have some connections to Barack Obama. SKDKnickerbocker’s managing director is Anita Dunn. You may remember Anita Dunn for her stint as White House Communications Director under Barack Obama before she resigned shortly after naming Mao Tse-tung as one of her favorite political philosophers.
While announcing her resignation Anita Dunn stated that she would work as an outside consultant and would continue to be involved in strategy. And now she is representing Sandra Fluke in what has become the hottest topic in Washington over the last two weeks. Or should I say, the topic the left has purposely made the hottest topic in Washington? I guess we know what Anita Dunn was talking about when she promised to help with Barack Obama’s strategy after she left his regime. It appears as if she has been working for Obama behind the scenes and we are just now beginning to see the fruits of her labor.
This whole issue has been designed from the beginning to take the focus off of the real issues facing our country as we move forward and it has worked. We can now see that this was a coordinated effort from the beginning; from George Stephanopoulos to the birth control mandate to Sandra Fluke to Media Matters and onto Anita Dunn this was well thought out plan, not simply a series of random acts. They just needed a catalyst and it was all given fuel by Rush Limbaugh. Hmmm, is he in on it too? Or is it just time for him to untie the other half of his brain from behind his back?
America's Watchtower 
I agree that Sandra was a plant, I don’t know how extensive the plot was, personally I think those in this scheme just took it one step at a time as the ongoing events unfolded and certainly were smiling as things fell into place. I believe this will be a short lived story and more important measures, such as gasoline prices and possible war, push to front and center in the weeks ahead. As far a s Rush is concerned, I’m sure he regrets having gotten into this mess, but then hindsight is always 20-20 so I’ll only condemn his language and not the effort to discredit this stooge of the left.
LikeLike
Think about this:
David Axelrod, is one of, if not, THE highest paid political consultants in the WORLD. Axelrod is a past master at the “smear”, the third rail “apparent coincidence”. He is using the same approach as the father of Public Relations–Edward Bernays. This is societal change, this kind of thing that winds up putting smoking in the motion pictures, so soon everyone is smoking (Bernays style effort). Now we are seeing apparent coincidences which seek to legitimatize a regime effort. Can this be something designed to make it “important to further the administration’s efforts”? Do not always look to “mainstream” or “direct” attacks. It is likely far more powerful to make people believe they are acting in their own interests, and with their “own” opinions, when they really are being supplied with those opinions.
LikeLike
It is quite possible that this wasn’t as coordinated as I have said it was, but it certainly seems to have been well planned out to me and I think it is likely that Obama had most of this plan in place before he made his announcement.
I also think this will be short lived as people will be focused on the gas prices in November and I have tried to avoid taking part in dragging it out, but they keep pulling me back in.
LikeLike
Super post today! The chickens came home to roost big time.
LikeLike
Thank you, and yes they have.
LikeLike
Talk about a stretch!
“Sandra Fluke is a 30 year old WOMAN who chose to go to Georgetown University specifically because this institute of higher learning did not offer birth control.”
I hear the tinfoil hat brigade again – just as Barack Obama’s parents manipulated the facts of his birth to permit him to become the US President 50 years later, Sandra Fluke caused one of the most selective law schools in the country to offer her admission so she could challenge its policy regarding health insurance.
” . . . the Obama regime’s assault on religious freedom. ‘
Eh? Talk about spin! The purpose of requiring contraceptive coverage is more related to birth control than to religious freedom.
I’ll tell you what, though – if the rightwing wins this particular battle, and “religious conviction” is permitted to trump the law with respect to terms and conditions of employment, the minimum wage will be the next to go (Jesus says workers should bargain with employers individually over the terms and conditions of employment), along with OSHA (where does the Bible say employers are obligated to provide a safe working environment?) and of course count on the RW to find biblical arguments supporting the elimination of Social Security and Medicare.
The law provides special exemptions for religious institutions, even hospitals, regarding coverage for contraceptives (which I believe is only prescribed contraceptives, not the kind that can be purchased over-the-counter). I disagree with the exemptions, but they were put in place to accommodate the religious beliefs of institutions whose existence is religious in nature – churches, obviously, and hospitals and other institutions, like religious schools.
The problem is that not all employees of such institutions are there to promote the institution’s religious mission, but to put food on their table. When religious institutions run enterprises that are part of the economy and employ regular people to do regular work (i.e., other than priests, nuns and other religious workers), they do so within the overall economic environment our society has produced, within the boundaries of the laws we’ve established, benefitting from the infrastructure we’ve created without respect to religion, and under society’s protection. What they’re proposing now is that despite being beneficiaries of all that we’ve created in this country, they should be considered exempt, basically, from any laws they find inconvenient. It’s not enough that they’ve managed to exempt themselves, largely, from contributing to that infrastructure, they want to extend that exemption to any other laws that might inconvenience them.
And of course there’s the related hypocrisy of the Catholic Church trying to claim the moral high ground in anything related to sex.
The more ridiculous element of this controversy is the idea that an employer engaged in some non-religious venture, like manufacturing automobiles or landscaping, suddenly has morals, a conscience. These organizations aren’t in business to promote religion or ideology, they’re in business for one purpose, to make money. They should not be permitted to claim religious status for the purpose of denying benefits to their employees so they can save money on the premium.
Take good care, and may God bless us all!
TGY
LikeLike
This was a plant. This was to engender acceptance of violation of the 1st Amendment. Troll much, do you? How much are you paid to do this?
LikeLike
I have to come to TGY’s defense here. He is a regular reader of my blog and we have had many interesting debates in the past and he is not trolling. I enjoy his input and always look forward to what he has to say about my posts.
LikeLike
TGY is entitled to his opinion as much as any of us. Just because you may not agree with him, does not make him wrong OR a troll. I enjoy seeing what he has to say and as I said, I might not agree with him, but I do take into consideration what he has to say and sometimes it makes me think from a different perspective, as it should. He has alot of knowledge to share, that is for sure.
LikeLike
Agreed Lou. There are trolls that pop up here once in awhile, as well as on other blogs as well. I consider a person a troll if they come to a blog and drop bombs intended to start a fight among the commenters and then don’t return to back up their claims. If they do return it is only to fan the flames they started. TGY does not fit into that category; his arguments are always well thought out and based in facts and he often returns to further a legitimate debate. I rarely agree with what he says, but as you said, he always makes me think.
LikeLike
What ever happened to ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL???? I love how everyone is throwing around the 1st amendment and saying how we need to stick to the constitution; however, when it comes to equal rights with gays..Republicans seem to overlook the Declaration of Independence??? Until the GOP decides to obey all of the principles this country was founded on, your argument is not valid with me!! Oh the hypocrisy!!!
LikeLike
But you don’t even know what my stance on gay marriage is, you are simply stereotyping me based on your own predudices of the Republican party. Until you stop using generalizations it is your argument which is not valid with me.
LikeLike
TGY,
If it is a stretch it is not my stretch. This was the talk of Boston radio for two days, I did not make it up. It seems to have originated from Glenn Beck on “The Blaze” and there are many sites also writing about this. I should have provided a link to source material on this, and for that I apologize.
As far as this not being an issue of religious freedom, none other than Ted Kennedy seemed to think it was. He worked tirelessly to ensure religious freedom was kept intact during the debate, going so far as to write a letter to the Vatican assuring the church that this wouldn’t happen to them. When he died the left rallied around him and made it their mantra to pass this bill for Ted Kennedy because this was something he had worked on his entire career. It is interesting that Obama would throw away the conscience clause that Ted Kennedy had believed in while they were using his memory to push healthcare reform through.
I have made my feeling about the Catholic church known in a previous post on this issue and I am not about to defend their hypocrisy here, we are in agreement there.
LikeLike
Fortunately we still have the freedom in this country to change jobs. If one doesn’t like the benefits where one is working, then go work where the benefits are more compatible with one’s needs.
LikeLike
Exactly, but Fluke chose Georgetown knowing it didn’t provide the benefits she was looking for and she did it to make this an issue and that is what bugs me the most about this.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Cmblake6's Weblog and commented:
Did you doubt it? This slut is a political plant, and the intent was to throw a monkey wrench into Rush. Viral, please.
LikeLike
Thanks for the reblog, there is no doubt in my mind that she was a plant from the very beginning. There was a reason why the Democrats invited her to Issa’s panel which was discussing religious liberty with men of the cloth. Her walking out of this panel was set up and was done to begin this onslaught.
LikeLike
SLUT????? Seriously?? I’m assuming that 1. You are a man. 2. You don’t have a wife or a daughter. 3. You are abstinent? I find it funny that men are calling women sluts for being responsible. Rush is a ignorant human being..I feel the same about you. It’s 2012..Have a decent discussion without the name calling. You are only contributing to the hatred in this country. YOU SIR DISGUST ME!!
LikeLike
And yes, I have a wife and 4 daughters. All of whom are committed to one partner. Don’t need to worry about as much contraception as this woman appears to need in an environment such as that, now do you?
LikeLike
I myself am married..thank you for asking. You should really try focusing all the energy that you are spending spreading hate and actually try to make a difference if you feel that strongly about the issue. Grow up..be an adult..and hopefully someday you will realize that there is more to life than trying to make others feel bad. ps..I’m sure your lovely daughters, wife and yourself probably had sex before they were married 🙂 I guess I can call them sluts too?? Oh wait..I’m better than that..good luck in life!!
LikeLike
Tracy, if I am reading the right comment it was directed at Sandra Fluke and not towards you.
LikeLike
Oh..and I just read your bio..YOU ARE A NUDIST AND YOU”RE CALLING HER A SLUT??????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Thank you for making me laugh you perv.
LikeLike
Tracy, Tracy, Tracy…I say it 3 times to address all 3 of your comments. And I do it here to particularly speak to the nudist shot. Do I ask the government to pay club dues? I agree, her wanting to take responsibility for her actions would be a good idea, but she can pay for it her own self. The fact that she went to a school that did not offer that particular form of preventive medicine, and then raised a stink about it seems a bit suspicious doesn’t it? As to the nudity, you don’t have to have sex just because you’re naked, but the intent of birth control devices are pretty blatantly obvious don’t you think? As to my abstinence, I am a married man, both of us have been “fixed”, and I am faithful to my one partner.
LikeLike
cumblake6, cumblake6, cumblake6…Birth control can be used for medical conditions also and that’s pretty blatantly obvious to me 🙂 Glad that you’ve been “fixed” 🙂 Thanks for not putting anymore cumblakes in this world 🙂
LikeLike
Tracy, you talk anout not spreading hate but you are doing just that. Cmbake is right and don’t think that I didn’t notive the way you intentionally misspelled his name) he is living his life the way he sees fit, and Ms. Fluke can liver her life the way she sees fit. But cmbake is not asking for the government to fund his behavior where Ms. Fluke is, that is where the difference lies.
LikeLike
Tracy, why the attacking? Is Cmblake6 not as entitled to his opinion as you are? Whatever his lifestyle is, is really not the issue, is it? His wife and children should be off limits, as well. A “word” that a Conservative talk show host throws out has been totally blown out of proportion. Were you as upset with what Palin and Bachmann were called? They were both worse words, but they were Conservatives, so guess you were not. I don’t appreciate any of those words, but this is just a cover-up. People sometimes say things before they have a chance to “think” and I bet the host regrets saying what he did. You coming here “ranting and raving”, that sure helps matters, doesn’t it? I agree with Steve, Ms. Fluke should live her life the way she wants, but when she goes in front of cameras, well, she has opened herself up to scrutiny. I do not feel the need to pay for her pills, condoms, IUD’s, shots or diaphram…so she needs to look elsewhere. Oh, and if the pill was needed for something like PCOS, I imagine it would be covered. You need to develop a stiffer backbone if you are going to attack and not expect to be attacked back for what you said. If you have something constructive to put, great, otherwise, I really don’t care to read it.
LikeLike
I agree Lou, Tracy came here to express her opinion and then went on the attack. I have no problem with her expressing her views but she would be better off if she simply gave up her viewpoint and didn’t resort to name calling. It lessens the point she was trying to make.
LikeLike
I apologize for my name calling..however it was in response to the original post that involved name calling..might I remind everyone that the word slut was used to describe a woman expressing her views. I originally posted a comment stating that the facts were wrong in this article accusing the writer of the article of providing false information and called the article garbage because of that. I immediately got a response implying that I was a slut. No one even talked about my original point. The name calling and belittling started with everyone on this site and I unfortunately joined in. I truly don’t care if a bunch of right winged conservatives take me seriously because quite frankly I think most of you are a joke!! I’m so glad I could ruffle so many feathers :). Good luck winning the election!! You are going to need it. It’s been fun!!
LikeLike
I fail to find where it was Implying YOU were a slut. No, you didn’t ruffle feather and if that was your intent, you failed miserably, Tracey. It was evident what you were doing and what you were from the get go. I guess you had your say and you will move on to the next blog, boy you really showed us, didn’t you? I can’t for the life of me think what you are doing is “fun”, but then again, maybe I am a bit better educated and mature than you are. What I would call your antics is “showing your butt”. You don’t need to worry about the election, it will take care of itself.
LikeLike
Tracy, just went through all the comments and I didn’t see anyone call you a slut.
Just for the record, if you have ready my previous posts on this issue I have not defended Rush for his slut comment because I think it was out of line. I also wasn’t defending him in this post either.
LikeLike
Looks like you beat me to the punch Lou. Nobody called Tracy a slut, perhaps she read something worng, or maybe she was just trying to raise the ire of some people.
LikeLike
For the record..I do not lie. There was an earlier post in which a man did imply that. Also, please do not insult my intelligence. I am a Pediatrician.. Probably have been through more schooling than everybody combined here. Do you want to try another insult and waste some more of your time? Get a life!! It has been fun reading all of your comments..my husband and I have been laughing all night. Call me immature..but you people are funny!!
LikeLike
Steve, looks like Tracy wanted to pick a fight, but guess she will need to move to another blog to do that. Oh, and you are assuming she can comprehend what she reads?
LikeLike
I’m sorry Louie..I don’t understand. Maybe you could draw me a picture??? I think I will stay on this blog for a while. Having too much fun to leave!! And it’s Tracy without the letter e. I know I know it’s hard when there are 5 or more letters. Keep practicing your alphabet buddy!! You will eventually learn it 🙂 🙂
LikeLike
How scary is that? Tracy is a pediatrician! And then the comment about more schooling than all combined is a testament to how bad our schools really are. Frightening that people like this are allowed to vote, but then how else would Obama have gotten into the White House?
“Keep practicing your alphabet buddy”??? Were all the years of schooling just to stay in kindergarten?
LikeLike
Tracy, I do not delete comments on this blog, I let them all stand. I think it is quite likely you misread something that was written.
LikeLike
To Integrity1st: I guess I got to you again 🙂 If you think that you are hurting my feelings by your lame comments..you are not. I save children’s lives..and you are going to make fun of that?? Last time I checked medical school was a little more difficult than elementary. Someday you are going to need a doctor to save your life and I’m sure at that point..you will not care if they are a “liberal”. I can’t stop laughing at how ridiculous everyone is on this website!! The only person who has been respectful is Steve and I appreciate that. It’s funny how I was the only one mature enough to even apologize for the name calling. I didn’t not misunderstand anything..look for a comment where I replied with “I’m married, thanks for asking”. Everyone on this site acts like a bunch of bully’s..and I got sucked into the hatred. YOU are what’s wrong with this country….SO MUCH HATRED!!!! GET OVER YOURSELVES!!!!!
LikeLike
With all respect, you are the one being disrespectful, assuming you have more schooling than everyone here combined is sure arrogant. To want to “get to people” as you were hoping you were doing, is very immature and I still stand on calling you that. As for any bad names, not once was that done from every post I read. It appears that you were daring people to reply back to you. Knudging them, if you will. If that is how you get your fun, you need to get serious and pay attention to what is going on in this country and what the administration is doing to us. I don’t care if you are a liberal or a democrat, but if you post here you should do it with some respect and not to just get your kicks. It just shows how immature you are and cute to pick up on the extra “e” in your name that I posted,,,so sorry for that…got a new laptop and am just getting used to the slant to the keyboard. However, you attacked me about the alphabet??? How stupid was that to say? By the way, I don’t know you well enough to have you calling me anything but Lou222. However, Louie is way off base. WE will get over ourselves, but it saddens me to think that you will move on to another blog and pull the same antics. So sad.
LikeLike
By the way, I added an extra “letter” in the above post as well, to give you something to pick on, just in case. Maybe someday I too can gain the “superior to others” status.
LikeLike
Louie..You are also disrespectful my dear conservative. YOU insulted my education level and made many more hateful comments. I will absolutely own the fact that I was being disrespectful!! I posted my response because of a woman being called a slut..and I’m the one with issues????????????? “Don’t need to worry about as much contraception as this woman appears to need in an environment such as that, now do you? ” was the comment I have been referring to from the cmblake.. I do not think I am better than others..I do know that I am better than you!! I would not support any man (if you can really call him that) that refers to a woman as a slut for expressing her opinion. And just for the record..I do not support ANYONE who does that left or right..and that is the difference between you and I. I see through the crap on both sides. Oh..this will be a real shocker to everyone…I voted for Ron Paul this primary season…yes one of you!! Why?? because I like his policies..not his “party”. I can almost guarantee NONE of you would vote for a democrat because you are all to narrow-minded for that!!!
LikeLike
Louie..it’s been a great debate..now go back to your nudist colony and enjoy yourself!!
LikeLike
No one insulted your education level, it was thrown in our faces how superior you were to us. Why do you feel the need to tell people how educated you are? I have yet to see anyone else on here doing that. It is just a given that we have useful information to share. Not that it is any of your business, but I do NOT vote straight party ticket and have voted for many Democrats in my long life. You on the other hand have an opinion of someone without knowing the facts, that is a dangerous place to be posting from. I will vote for Ron Paul, as well, does that shocks you? I saw him on Saturday, he gave a great talk. I am more Libertarian leaning, but you only assume that I was a horrible Republican. You are mistaken about the nudist colony, I have never been to one. You are flustered, I can see that. One makes mistakes in that state of mind. You should join in on some constructive debate, you might actually enjoy it. It takes so much more effort to be in an attack mode. I would say you probably have alot to offer here, if you would just do that. I would welcome your input, as I am sure the others would. You would be suprised how disgusted some here are with the Republican party, as well.
LikeLike
Lou, I sure have to give you credit; you are persistent, that’s for sure 🙂
tracy keeps coming here and talking about the immaturity of the commenters here, and then after apologizing for the name calling she continues to call people names. It is clear her only intention here is to get under the skin of the commenters, she is offering no real input on the debate.
LikeLike
Tracy, Lou is not the nudist, the nudist is cmblake.
LikeLike
It would be interesting to know who selected fluke to testify before congress. They didn’t go and pick a coed at random, did they?
LikeLike
Nope. Ever hear of the training Russian youth used to receive for infiltration? I’m reminded.
LikeLike
This started out with Issa’s panel on religious freedom. Issa had a panel with men of the cloth and Sandra Fluke was invited by Democrats to witness this panel. She is the one who stood up and declared she was offended that Republicans would hold a hearing on birth control and not have a single woman on the panel. The media ran with it, calling Issa’s hearing a hearing on birth control when that isn’t what it was. The Democrats then held their own hearing and invited her to testify. The fix was in from the beginning.
LikeLike
WAY OFF TOPIC, BUT i CANT FIND A CONTACT LINK.
I know you are very busy BUT why did I have to go to PRAVDA to find a well done article on obama’s birth?
because our media would never print this and I hope you can spare a moment to take a look at it. http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/07-03-2012/120708-arizona_sheriff_obama-0/
LikeLike
The bit about Sheriff Joe pronouncing the President’s birth certificate a forgery was on NBC and ABC, as well as CBS.
LikeLike
I wasn’t even going to bother replying to this. My email address is right up there in the corner if he had looked but he didn’t bother. He will not be back to read any responses, so I will not give him the time of day.
LikeLike
Did they show the entire conference? Or did they just “Oh yeah, here’s another “birther””? Although, I will admit that when I took my post Thursday night, the person I relieved had CNN on, and they were asking questions I was liking to hear!
LikeLike
Really..we are still on the birth certificate issue??? I laughed when I saw your post 🙂 You silly Republicans..you’re all the same..focusing energy on all the important issues of this world..birth control, gay marriage, and Obama’s birth certificate. Democrats are focusing on non-important issues such as equal rights, healthcare for everyone, the economy (that we had to fix from the last Republican in the white house), housing market etc…Please..let’s focus on something that will make a difference in the world..I think everyone would agree..this has no impact on anyone..except for those who care about insignificant issues!!
LikeLike
You blame Republicans for not focusing on the important issues but it was Barack Obama who deflected the debate away from the important issues to take the focus off of his horrible record. He brought this issue to light and now we are debating it. But you think we should just accept whatever he says without question; in other words we should just shut up and not voice our displeasure and that is about as un-American of a position as one can hold.
LikeLike
How is it that everyone except the Republican establishment have figured this out?
LikeLike
I wish I had an answer, somehow the Republicans got outflanked and out smarted once again.
LikeLike
Mitt Romney was asked the question about birth control because of previous comments that had been made by Santorum..NOT because George had “inside” information. Anyone who has been keeping up with this election would know that. To me the fact that the article started off with a false statement, implies that the article is GARBAGE!! I have to laugh because I’m guessing most of the people who believe this probably don’t watch the debates, news, or read any related articles. This is what’s wrong with this country. Instead of arguing over birth control and conspiracy theories..how about you spend that time educating yourself or doing something positive for the world around you?? People..there are a lot more important things going on in this world…lets focus our energy on those!!
LikeLike
Most of the people who comment here–and myself included–follow politics very closely, we are not uneducated, we simply don’t hold the same belief as you.
There are more important issues than this, you are right, but it is Barack Obama who decided that this was a big issue and moved it ahead of doing more important things. This mustn’t be forgotten.
LikeLike
Tracy, we are really, really keeping up with this election, trust me. You have no idea what any of our education levels are, do you? Apparently you like to generalize and attack, possibly not a good stance to take on this blog. By doing that, I think most of the posters, no matter what their party affiliation is, will write you off. Nobody likes a no-it-all that is not willing to at least see the other side.
LikeLike
Agreed Lou, I know that most of the people who comment here are following this closely. Quite a few of them have blogs of their own and for Tracy to just assume that we mustn’t follow current events simply because we do not have the same opinion of her says more about her than it does about us.
LikeLike
What false statement? She is a plant, that has been established. The PR firm that represents her is run by Obama’s “former” communications director. Well, I guess that could be a coincidence.
LikeLike
Time to block Tracy, Steve. Not because of dissenting views, but because she is insane and her only goal is to flame arguments on issues for which she has no facts. Moreover, it seems her only objective is to insult, and quite frankly, I have better things to do than read over her comments before ascertaining she is 100% moron. For example, she thinks we don’t have anything better to do when we have before us the most important task facing this country, i.e., getting an imposter, communist out of the White House.
LikeLike
Indeed.
LikeLike
She is definitely here to stoke the fires by winding people up, and she isn’t interested in debating the issue as we can tell by how quickly she veered away from the issue.
We are heading into the biggest election of our lives and I think it is very important that we debate these issues heading into the election, so yeah, I guess I don’t have anything better to do. What could be more important?
LikeLike
I have mentioned in the past that an old college pal is chief deputy to a well known California congressman. Part of our deal had been for me to keep that source “35,” or in cop lingo confidential.
With that said it seems that it is no secret in certain circles that Sandra Fluke, held to a standard of sainthood in the fema-Nazi movement has no need for birth control because women cannot impregnate each other.
I am sure like anything else that fact will eventually come out though Axelrod and the rest of the Chicago cabal will deny or “smear” anyone stating or exposing any truth contrary to their party line….WM
LikeLike
Ah, a very interesting turn of events for sure. You are right though, this probably won’t come out because it will be considered a smear and would only serve to keep her in the limelight when her 15 minutes should already be up.
LikeLike
Another way to know that this was a Dem party job is that Gloria Alred has chimed in as well. She’s a master political operative, and only shows up when it’s time to bash a Conservative.
LikeLike
You’ve got that right and she wants to sue Limbaugh for exercising his first amendment rights. That is going way overboard’ she Rush went to far, but he will pay the price and we don’t need to start suing people for their beliefs whether or not you agree with them.
LikeLike
Matt, she just likes to be on tv.
LikeLike
Exactly,
LikeLike
She has written an op-ed piece that cements firmly that she is nothing more than a political operative for the Obama White House….WM
LikeLike
Evidently Tracy is another type of plant. Tracy indirectly attacks our 1st Amendment rights by stating that we ‘over use’ that Amendment in our arguments. News flash – that’s what it was written for. Just another example of an under educated leftist sycophant….WM
LikeLike