Militant freed during the Arab Spring might be responsible for the attack on the American consulate in Libya

 When the revolutions which the mainstream media dubbed the ‘Arab Spring’ first broke out in the Middle East Barack Obama was given full credit for inspiring democracy in the region by way of his Cairo speech.  

  Barack Obama himself even extolled the virtues of a people struggling for freedom and liberty, calling it a “joyful longing for human freedom,” while the mainstream media giddily bought into the virtues of Barack Obama’s new Middle East policy, drawing a clear distinction between Barack Obama’s approach and that of President Bush’s. Neither the Obama regime nor the media seemed to ask the question of who was going to come to power in the void left behind.

  But as predicted in the conservative blogoshpere the virtues of the ‘Arab Spring’ quickly dissipated as Jew hating radical extremists, in the form of the Muslim Brotherhood, gained a foothold in the region and rose to a power they could only dream of at one time.

    The Obama regime tried to spin this unfortunate–if not unpredictable–turn of events by stating that democracy takes on different forms in different countries and while the Muslim Brotherhood might be frowned upon in the United States this was the body chosen by the people to represent them. And after all, who are we to judge?

  The Arab Spring never really stopped after the overthrow of the leaders in Egypt and Libya, and now it appears as if the Arab Spring led directly to the attack on the American consulate in Libya. Not only is the mainstream media unwilling to tie Barack Obama’s policies to the attack they have disassociated Barack Obama  from the Arab Spring now that it isn’t what is seemed to be, and Barack Obama has distanced himself as well.

  I mentioned that is now appears as if the Arab Spring led to the attack on the American consulate in Libya which resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including our ambassador. Here’s how I have come to that conclusion:

  It is now being reported that a militant who escaped from prison during the Arab Spring, Muhammad Jamal Abu Ahmad, was involved in the attack because he trained the consulate attackers.

Fighters linked to one freed militant, Muhammad Jamal Abu Ahmad, took part in the Sept. 11 attack on U.S. diplomatic outposts in Libya that killed four Americans, U.S. officials believe based on initial reports. Intelligence reports suggest that some of the attackers trained at camps he established in the Libyan Desert, a former U.S. official said.

  And he isn’t the only one to take advantage of the Arab Spring either:

Mr. Ahmad, although believed to be one of the most potent of the new militant operatives emerging from the chaos of the Arab Spring, isn’t the only one, according to Western officials. They say others are also trying to exploit weaknesses in newly established governments and develop a capacity for strikes that could go well beyond recent violent protests in Libya, Egypt and elsewhere.

  The “joyful longing for human freedom” has turned out to be quite a disaster and has further destabilized a volatile region. During the chaos of the Arab Spring it appears as if several very dangerous American hating men were allowed to escape from jail and I feel it is quite likely they didn’t escape on their own, I am almost positive they received help from the sympathetic freedom fighters and if Barack Obama’s Cairo speech inspired the revolutions he supported it only stands to reason that he is partly responsible for the situation on the ground which allowed these men to either escape or be freed.

  I think we now have a pretty good idea why the Obama regime was so anxious about putting the blame for this attack on a You Tube video and arresting the man who created it, and I think we now have a pretty good idea what the Obama regime is trying to cover up.