Skip to content

Did Valerie Jarrett leak the Hillary Clinton email story?

March 15, 2015

  Is Valerie Jarrett the one who leaked the story to the New York Times about Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email account during her time at the State Department? Does that question sound outrageous? After all, why would the White House leak a story which could come back to haunt the President?

  According to this story that is exactly what happened:

   Here is more:

Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett leaked to the press details of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail address during her time as secretary of state, sources tell me.

But she did so through people outside the ­administration, so the story couldn’t be traced to her or the White House.

“My contacts and friends in newspapers and TV tell me that they’ve been contacted by the White House and offered all kinds of negative stories about us,” one of Bill’s friends quotes him as saying. “The Obamas are behind the e-mail story, and they’re spreading rumors that I’ve been with women, that Hillary promoted people at the State Department who’d done favors for our foundation, that John Kerry had to clean up diplomatic messes Hillary left behind.”

Then, according to this source, Bill added: “The Obamas are out to get us any way they can.”

  This source claims that Valerie Jarrett is also responsible for all of the State Department investigations into Hillary Clinton at this time:

In addition, at Jarrett’s behest, the State Department was ordered to launch a series of investigations into Hillary’s conduct at Foggy Bottom, including the use of her expense account, the disbursement of funds, her contact with foreign leaders and her possible collusion with the Clinton Foundation.

Six separate probes into Hillary’s performance have been ­going on at the State Department.

  That is interesting, especially in light of the speculation that the Department of Injustice is only seeking criminal corruption charges against New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez for retribution because of his opposition to the President’s foreign policy.

  But what could possibly be the motivation for the White House to leak the email story to the press? According to the above-linked story it is because Valerie Jarrett believes the Clintons were working behind the scenes during the 2014 election to create dissension between Democrats and the President.

Last fall, during the run-up to the 2014 midterm elections, Jarrett was heard to complain bitterly that the Clintons were turning congressmen, senators, governors and grass-root party members against Obama by portraying him as an unpopular president who was an albatross around the neck of the party.

Jarrett was said to be livid that most Democrats running for election refused to be seen campaigning with the president. She blamed the Clintons for marginalizing the president and for trying to wrestle control of the Democratic Party away from Obama.

And she vowed payback.

  This all comes from an unnamed source and we do not know how reliable this source is so take this for what it is worth. However, there is still one interesting point to make in speculation: it should not be forgotten that Barack Obama originally claimed he only heard about the email scandal when he heard about it on the news along with the rest of us, however that was not true and the White House was forced to “massage” the original story when it was learned the President knew much earlier.

  The truth should not have to be “massaged” so it makes you wonder if he is trying to hide something…

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

22 Comments leave one →
  1. Father Athanasius's avatar
    Father Paul Lemmen permalink
    March 15, 2015 8:46 am

    Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Zip-a-Dee's avatar
    March 15, 2015 11:32 am

    A neighbor and I were discussing some of the going-ons of today and he stated that these people find-themselves-out (are exposed for who they are) and bring each other down … or out. This seems to be the case here! I think it’s funny. [Grant it, none of us like our own ‘things’ exposed, but theirs involves the lives of so many.] Funny too how Bill uses this as a platform to dispel ‘attacks’ against him, womanizing, and their pilfering funds and under-table-dealings thru their foundation and contributors (in exchange for positions or contracts) which is pretty well known to be true! Maybe Jarrett wants to keep her position and one way to do it is to continue on their ‘dictator’ path and no more elections. A year is a long way away when this Regime is accelerating their efforts. Goes to show that when a enemy takes-over a Nation and make their own rules and redesigns the social system structure, why let those who kick at them have a chance.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      March 15, 2015 6:29 pm

      I found it interesting that Bill mentioned womanizing also because we have not heard any of this talk since he left office. It makes me wonder if he knows something is coming out. Jarrett did say this was only the beginning. I don’t know what is motivating this but I am going to enjoy it while it lasts…

      Like

      • Laura Bernard Mielcarek's avatar
        March 15, 2015 6:35 pm

        I noticed that and wondered, also, Steve. It would be pretty foolish for him to do something that might negatively affect Hillary,if she runs that is. Then again, what he did in the Oval Office with Ms. Lewinsky was pretty foolish. 😉

        Liked by 1 person

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        March 15, 2015 6:39 pm

        He does have a history…

        Like

  3. Pjetermc3's avatar
    Pjetermc3 permalink
    March 15, 2015 12:06 pm

    Its just not fair. Here is Valjar trying her best to get the bomb for her Iramian mullah homies and along comes Obieone with his special “Get Hillary assignment. Where are this asshats priorities?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Laura Bernard Mielcarek's avatar
    March 15, 2015 3:20 pm

    I don’t who is a scarier, more evil woman – jarret or clinton.

    Way, way back when obama and clinton were duking it out for the nomination, it was the clintons who first raised the question of obama’s eligibility. Articles I read reported that Bill just hated obama, loathed him. Bill didn’t want to back down about the eligibility question even after a close friend of theirs was found dead. Then all of a sudden, an abrupt about-face. Speculation was that Chelsea had been threatened and that’s what got the clintons to finally drop it. All rumor of course, wink, wink.

    I can’t stand any of them and would like to see all 3 of them prosecuted.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      March 15, 2015 6:32 pm

      There is not even a lesser of two evils here…
      I remember during that campaign when Bill said something to the effect of “ten years ago this boy would be carrying our luggage.” And then the Obama campaign basically called Bill a racist. I believe this bad blood carries on to this day.

      Like

      • Laura Bernard Mielcarek's avatar
        March 15, 2015 6:38 pm

        Yes, I was pretty surprised when he chose her for SoS. Maybe a case of ‘keep your friends close and your enemies closer?’

        Liked by 1 person

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        March 15, 2015 6:41 pm

        I am not sure what the thinking was there, almost seems like some kind of deal was struck but now it seems as if Obama is showing his true colors.

        Like

      • Laura Bernard Mielcarek's avatar
        March 15, 2015 7:02 pm

        A deal, most definitely. So, this is Jarrett whispering in obama’s ear? Telling him he can’t let her get away with what she did? She needs to be put in her place? Shown who’s boss? Make an example of her?

        Or….they have nothing to do with it. Naaahh, not possible, lol. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

      • Steve Dennis's avatar
        March 15, 2015 7:15 pm

        Jarrett is his most trusted adviser…

        Like

  5. Dr. Jeff's avatar
    Dr. Jeff permalink
    March 15, 2015 3:46 pm

    I’ve found similar stories in The Los Angeles Times and The Daily Mail from Britain. It looks as if we have a very public gang war, Obamaniacs vs. Clintonites.

    If it weren’t for all the damage our country will take from it, I’d be in heaven. Ah well, at least it will screw up Obama in his relations with the House and Senate. It might even crack the secrecy on illegal moves by both the Clintons AND Obama. We know Obama’s dirty, I want to see the “smoking gun.” Regardless, he’s a little closer to getting neutralized, a prisoner in the White House for almost two years. Let’s be honest, it’s the best outcome we could hope for at this point.

    =======================

    Hat Tip: My Mother who taught this to me around 3 years old.

    There once were two cats of Kilkenny.
    Each thought there was one cat too many.

    So they fought and they fit
    and they scratched and they bit.

    Now instead of two cats,
    there aren’t any.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Steve Dennis's avatar
      March 15, 2015 6:34 pm

      Ever since the SC primary there has been bad blood between these two camps and it seems as if it continues to this day. I am enjoying this very much but you are right about the seriousness of this and the fact that the future of this country could hang in the balance.

      Like

  6. Dr. Jeff's avatar
    Dr. Jeff permalink
    March 15, 2015 3:50 pm

    P.S. The one unbelievable thing is that they’re taking the time and effort to do this to each other. They both want to screw up the country and they’re taking the time to screw each other instead. Pure spite at this point, there isn’t even a good political advantage for Obama.

    After the massive dumping of Dems in the last election, does he think he’s going to hold them in line with fear? Right now I think Dem office holders are a lot more scared of their local constituents (as it should be) than they are of Obama.

    Liked by 1 person

Trackbacks

  1. Florida refuses to bend over for Obamacare

Leave a comment