Skip to content

Dianne Feinstein contradicts Barack Obama’s claim that ISIS is contained

November 16, 2015

 Despite Barack Obama’s claim that the terrorist organization he once called a “JV team” is contained liberal California Democrat Dianne Feinstein has come out and said that not only is ISIS not contained but that they are spreading and she has never been more concerned.

  Here is more:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein sharply contradicted President Barack Obama on Monday, disagreeing with his claim that the Islamic State is “contained.”

“I’ve never been more concerned,” the California Democrat and Intelligence Committee ranking member told Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC Monday. “I read the intelligence faithfully. ISIL is not contained. ISIL is expanding.

“They just put out a video saying it is their intent to attack this country. I think we have to be prepared,” she continued.

  At this point I trust Dianne Feinstein more than I do Barack Obama because the last time the President claimed a terrorist organization was on the run was during the 2012 election when he was talking about alQaeda and we all know how that turned out in Benghazi…

 malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

12 Comments leave one →
  1. Bruce permalink
    November 16, 2015 9:41 pm

    I will call my Senator and for the first time agree with her, and ask her to lead on this issue.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. November 17, 2015 9:51 am

    She sees this as an opportunity for the federal government to further infringe on our Rights, that’s all. She will want to expand the government’s ability to spy on us. She’s not on our side here.

    Liked by 3 people

    • November 17, 2015 1:17 pm

      Agree Laura. It’s as ‘contained’ as they want it to be or ‘not contained’ depending what . Hype and Sensationalism to further emotional control and manipulate the populous.
      Notice her left eye – a bit strange:

      Those kind of automatics are given to these groups to service the Regime’s purposes.

      Liked by 2 people

      • November 17, 2015 8:50 pm

        She would have voted to confiscate weapons and admits the only thing that stopped her was that she did not have the votes because of course she was not going to let the Constitution stand in her way!

        Liked by 2 people

    • November 17, 2015 8:49 pm

      I agree also Laura, she is one of those who supports domestic spying and there is no doubt she would love to use this to expand it!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. petermc3 permalink
    November 17, 2015 10:54 am

    I watched that interview and while for the first time ever this old hag appeared to be sincere we know who she really is. That being said one needs to be vigilant and speculate that there must be an ulterior motive; let’s hope not.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. November 17, 2015 10:58 am

    One thing you need to consider about Feinstein is that she is someone who is not pro-liberty by any definition. She is a strong supporter of government surveillance and intrusions on our rights. She could be right or she could be trying to not let a crisis go to waste. I’m apt to think it is the latter.

    Liked by 4 people

Trackbacks

  1. Dianne Feinstein contradicts Barack Obama’s claim that ISIS is contained | Rifleman III Journal
  2. King Solomon, Paris Terrorism | Rudy u Martinka

Leave a comment