Skip to content

The FBI to release redacted Orlando terrorist 911 tapes without references to terrorism

June 19, 2016

loretta lynch The reaction of both the left and the right in the wake of the Orlando terrorist attack in a gay nightclub last week was as predictable as it was disgusting: the right used this tragedy in an attempt to exploit Barack Obama’s ineptitude and seemingly unwillingness to confront a scenario which is likely to become more commonplace as the weeks go on while the left took advantage of this horrible act to push gun control.

In my opinion this was disrespectful to the dead, their families, and their friends and I purposely avoided getting sucked into the debate last week because I found it to be unseemly to use such a tragedy to promote a political agenda in the guise of doing it to honor the dead–on both sides.

  The reaction was agenda driven and had nothing to do with anything else and the agenda is still being driven with the news that the FBI is going to release the 911 transcripts…sort of.

    According to this story the FBI is going to release the transcripts of the 911 calls while redacting any reference to jihad, ISIS, or any other terrorist group. Here is more:

In an interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd, Attorney General Loretta Lynch says that on Monday, the FBI will release edited transcripts of the 911 calls made by the Orlando nightclub shooter to the police during his rampage.

“What we’re not going to do is further proclaim this man’s pledges of alleigance to terrorist groups, and further his propaganda,” Lynch said. “We are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance [to the Islamic State].”

  Here is more:

CHUCK TODD: You say partial, what’s being left out?

LYNCH: What we’re not going to do is further proclaim this man’s pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups, and further his propaganda.

CHUCK TODD: We’re not going to hear him talk about those things?

LYNCH: We will hear him talk about some of those things, but we are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance and that.

  Loretta Lynch claims the FBI will not be releasing his pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups so as not to further his agenda but I would make the claim they are doing so to further their own agenda, just as they did in the wake of the Benghazi terrorist attack when they also downplayed the role of radical Islamists by claiming this was a spontaneous reaction to a You Tube video nobody had ever heard of before the attack 

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

30 Comments leave one →
  1. June 19, 2016 8:55 pm

    This post relates directly to the prior post. Why is the government editing the 911 calls? We need transparency. The government has an agenda and it does not want the public to know.

    Here is a InfoWar video on …. ( I know Alex can be a little over the top)

    Liked by 1 person

  2. lou222 permalink
    June 19, 2016 9:26 pm

    You are right, Steve, tragedy that is used for political gains is a bunch of crap. There are families that lost loved ones, DC needs to back off and let them grieve, but they probably will not.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. June 19, 2016 10:37 pm

    The Big Lie about radical Islamic terrorism:

    “So we finally unlock the Great Mystery: why oh why does is this administration and the Clinton campaign so reluctant to utter the words “radical Islamic terrorism”? ..

    What they’re afraid of is alienating their allies in the Middle East …And of course there’s the Clinton Foundation, which has received millions in “donations” from the Saudi royals and their satellites.

    The US policy goal in the region is to block the Iranians and their Shi’ite allies, .. in order to protect our vaunted ally Israel …

    Liked by 1 person

  4. June 20, 2016 12:12 am

    Because they don’t want to call themselves ‘terrorist’ since they were behind it?
    False Flag Proof: Indiana Bomber Turned Himself In For Fear Of His Life
    ‘Howell told police he was turning himself in because he wanted protection. His story was that he had been assured by his recruiters that he would not be harmed in the shooting but, when he heard on the news that Omar Mateen, the lead gunman in the Orlando group, had been killed by sniper fire, he realized he was being set up as a patsy and would be killed.’
    Pretty clear who the real ‘terrorist’ are.

    Liked by 1 person

    • June 20, 2016 5:24 am

      Very interesting, isn’t it funny how you don’t hear anything about this man any more?

      Liked by 1 person

      • June 20, 2016 8:31 am

        It makes you wonder who is radicalizing who. Most of the so called U.S. terrorist who were arrested were set up by the FBI. So it makes you wonder about those who were killed. Did the FBI just screw up?

        Liked by 1 person

      • June 20, 2016 6:49 pm

        And that plays into the Napolitano video you shared in another post!


  5. lou222 permalink
    June 20, 2016 11:28 am

    As much crap as we are being force fed and how we have to be politically correct, thought you all might like this article….it show how stupid this whole situation has become about guns:

    Liked by 1 person

  6. June 20, 2016 1:32 pm

    The “big lie” requires someone being on the 5 Sunday morning t.v. shows. Just like Susan Rice with her video lie. That was the “tell.”

    Liked by 2 people

    • June 20, 2016 6:55 pm

      I just saw a headline which said support for gun control is up after the Orlando terrorist attack so sadly it looks like the big lie might be working…

      Liked by 1 person

  7. June 20, 2016 7:18 pm

    Wow. Can I get a “cognitive dissonance”, anybody? The writer does the exact same thing the he criticizes others of. You do not want to give the asshole a voice? In my opinion, it is the best thing for our security to not release the tapes of even redacted transcripts. It should be sufficient to only release a summary of them. We now know that this killer stated that we should expect more attacks to immediately follow. What if this is a message? What if this causes some other nut to advance their time table and start killing people? Nothing good comes out of the release of these tapes.

    Liked by 1 person

    • June 20, 2016 7:23 pm

      Thanks for stopping by and voicing your opinion. I would have had no problem if they had decided not to release the tapes at all or if they decided to release them in full, my problem is that by releasing only a partial transcript it was ripe with political undertones and eventually the government realized they were wrong and released the entire transcript.


      • lou222 permalink
        June 20, 2016 7:37 pm

        Wasn’t there going to be a word change of inserting GOD for ALLAH? Seems a bit off and misleading to do that, but then again it is Loretta Lynch and her boss! Apparently it is ok to use GOD in this context, but not anywhere else…………riiiiight!

        Liked by 1 person

      • June 20, 2016 7:40 pm

        Yes they did change allah to God! From what I understand allah means God so it would seem on the surface this is not a big deal but it is a big deal because they are once again trying to downplay the jihad aspect to this whole thing.

        Liked by 1 person

      • lou222 permalink
        June 20, 2016 8:36 pm

        I think they just wanted to “Americanize” it to where it has nothing to do with Islam. I don’t trust anything out of the mouths of these people in the Administration.

        Liked by 1 person

      • June 21, 2016 5:52 am

        It is all just propaganda at this point…


    • lou222 permalink
      June 20, 2016 7:39 pm

      James, you may be right, that it might insight someone else to act, but at this point, I would rather know the whole truth….I am tired of these half truths or something that has been white washed.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. June 21, 2016 12:03 am

    I have big problem when the anti Christian progressives start their equivalency of allah with God. This is the same crap the Pope is trying to foist on the public. “Oh we are all the same and we believe in the same god. The Bible and quran are not the same. This is the slippery slope of progressive revisionism.

    Liked by 1 person

    • June 21, 2016 5:53 am

      I am right there with you on this one! It is obvious to me why they changed the transcript.


      • June 21, 2016 6:24 am

        The other point is the transcript says Arabic. I thought he was of Afghan decent. Afghanistan’s native language is Pashto.

        Liked by 1 person

      • June 21, 2016 7:07 pm

        That is interesting, I didn’t know that!



  1. The FBI to release redacted Orlando terrorist 911 tapes without references to terrorism | Rifleman III Journal

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: