Skip to content
Advertisements

Barack Obama fired a top scientist to advance global warming agenda

December 20, 2016

 For years we have been told that global warming is settled science because 97% of scientists agree that it is real (a number Barack Obama magically transformed into 99.5% just over one year ago) however that number, as I wrote about in this post, is based on a lie.

The origin of the “97 percent” statistic has been traced back to a 2009 study by University of Illinois/Chicago graduate student Kendall Zimmerman, who sent a survey to 10,257 earth scientists asking them two questions:

 “When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?” and

 “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?”

Eighty-two percent of the 3,146 scientists who completed the survey (a 30.7% response rate) answered “yes” to question 2.

  So only 30.7% of the scientists who were surveyed bothered to answer the survey and of that 30.7% only 82% answered yes to the question of global warming being man-made, so where does the 97% number come from? 

That figure included 75 of the 79 individuals (97.4%) who self-identified themselves as climate scientists.

  The survey was sent to over 10,000 scientists and out of that group 79 of those who bothered to answer the survey identified themselves as climate scientists, and out of that number 75 of them said global warming was man-made. So it turns out for all the hoopla this whole notion that 97% of scientists believe global warming is man-made we are taking the word of 75 scientists out of a total of over 10,000 scientists.

  But now we are learning there is a high price to be paid by scientists if they do not go along to get along with the Obama regime’s radical global warming agenda. They get fired and/or intimidated:

A new congressional investigation has determined that the Obama administration fired a top scientist and intimidated staff at the Department of Energy in order to further its climate change agenda, according to a new report that alleges the administration ordered top officials to obstruct Congress in order to forward this agenda.

A top DoE scientist who liaised with Congress on the matter was fired by the Obama administration for being too forthright with lawmakers, according to the report, which provides an in-depth look at the White House’s efforts to ensure senior staffers toe the administration’s line.

 The report also provides evidence that the Obama administration worked to kill legislation in order to ensure that it could receive full funding for its own hotly contested climate change agenda.

The report additionally discovered efforts by the Obama administration to censor the information given to Congress, interfering with the body’s ability to perform critical oversight work.

“Instead of providing the type of scientific information needed by Congress to legislate effectively, senior departmental officials sought to hide information, lobbied against legislation, and retaliated against a scientist for being forthcoming,” Smith said in a statement. “In this staff report based on lengthy record before the committee, much has been revealed about how senior level agency officials under the Obama administration retaliated against a scientist who did not follow the party line.”

   And here is more, this scientist was fired for giving the Congress too much information:

In mid-2014, lawmakers introduced legislation, the Low Dose Radiation Act of 2014, to help regulate the program and minimize harmful side effects.

During an October 2014 briefing with senior DoE staff on the matter, lawmakers heard testimony from Dr. Noelle Metting, the radiation research program’s manager.

Less than a month later, lawmakers discovered that Obama administration officials had “removed Dr. Metting from federal service for allegedly providing too much information in response to questions posed by” Congress during the briefing, the report states.

Congressional investigators later determined that the administration’s “actions to remove Dr. Metting were, in part, retaliation against Dr. Metting because she refused to conform to the predetermined remarks and talking points designed by Management to undermine the advancement of” the 2014 radiation act.

  The end justifies the means, is it any wonder that more and more Americans are starting to question the legitimacy of the global warming agenda?

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

Advertisements
20 Comments leave one →
  1. December 20, 2016 8:37 pm

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Liked by 1 person

    • December 21, 2016 6:29 am

      Thank you.

      Like

      • December 21, 2016 6:32 am

        You’re welcome.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. December 20, 2016 9:24 pm

    Yes, it’ll be interesting to watch the walls crumble down – I don’t think Trump believes that lie and realizes money is going to the wrong ‘people’ (once again)!
    A neighbor sent out a Christmas letter stating the “jaw dropping results of the election and the concern, traumas, shock of that, along w/ the intensified tumult and suffering of the innocent being displayed in the media. And isn’t that the media the major problem (fake news – gross lies – manipulation of people emotions – sensationalized, fabricated, misdirected news reports)! THAT is the one of the major PROBLEMs. Those who only listen to main stream cesspool news are victims of abusive propaganda and psychological warfare! Bari being the cardboard front for alot of it. The fraud leader with a mouth used for destruction and the media calling it progressive change. Some so ‘taken in by the Lie’ they are depressed – believing Trump is the antichrist. Not realizing we just are getting rid of one and not wanting Jezebel to replace it! So I agree Steve they are the reason for “Global Warming” and we need to get rid of them (problems) for the good of ALL!

    Liked by 1 person

    • December 21, 2016 6:32 am

      That is 100% right! All the news outlets in the country are owned by something like 5 different people and they all have the same agenda and that is a very powerful tool because until recently people thought the news was really about reporting the news. I think they are losing their grip so they will be coming after the internet.

      Liked by 2 people

      • December 21, 2016 12:29 pm

        Yes, unfortunately those very people watching and believing them view them on the internet that tells them, “Believe us, alt news tells you lies!” How that for keeping people in the dark!!

        Liked by 2 people

      • December 21, 2016 1:07 pm

        I meant ‘How’s that ..’ got derailed to catch away a pesky cawing crow. And isn’t that the nature of those irritants behind the fraud un-news reporting – rather programing – liars. The youth and simple minded taking it all in as true and it pacifies, goes along w/, their fleshly nature (which is sin based). Unless a person is ‘born of God’ – having their spirit transformed and their mind being renewed in real Truth (cleaning away the lie) – they cannot discern truth from error, to their benefit. “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” 1 Cor. 2:14 That’s TRUTH speaking, being able to “understand that” and “receive it” requires hearing Words of Truth that MAKES US FREE – believing and trusting them. Sin and the Law condemns us but The Life of Christ saves. Since it’s soon Christmas, why not receive God’s gift, the Spirit of Promise, Eternal Life (believe God and Trust Him, toss out unbelief) – tis the season to be Jolly! 🎁

        Liked by 1 person

      • December 21, 2016 8:02 pm

        They are trying to cover all the bases, aren’t they?

        Like

      • December 21, 2016 8:03 pm

        Yeah, the truth will make us free but sadly too many people don’t seem to want to know the truth!

        Like

  3. petermac3 permalink
    December 20, 2016 11:13 pm

    Think of the school children from pre-k through high school in the western world who are subject to the libtards full spectrum of propaganda from global warming/climate change to anti judeo-christian/pro muslim. Surely there’s a special place in hell for the Obama’s, the Gores, the Clintons. and the nameless others of their ilk. Hopefully they’ll meet LBJ and Carter there also.

    Liked by 2 people

    • December 21, 2016 6:35 am

      Yeah, it is tough to fight this when it has been taught in the schools for over a generation now!

      Like

  4. December 21, 2016 12:07 am

    Who are the players in this debate. As always follow the mney.

    Liked by 3 people

    • December 21, 2016 6:47 am

      Excellent! Thanks for sharing that!

      Like

  5. December 21, 2016 12:10 am

    Apparently our cmmon core students can’t perform this simple experiment. No wonder why we are so far behind in scienceand math!

    Liked by 3 people

  6. December 21, 2016 8:07 am

    The biggest scam ever perpetrated on America. All that one has to do is look at the roots of this movement, and that is what it is. An excuse to control every aspect of our lives

    Liked by 2 people

    • petermac3 permalink
      December 21, 2016 8:45 am

      While I am pretty sure it was in Mrs. Rothman’s third grade class back in 1959 we learned that while freezing ice crystallizes and expands the volume of water remains constant. Or was it in the Mrs. Patervane’s second grade class? And we could read, spell as well as use cursive handwriting. What brutal times they were. Imagine forcing the fundamentals of education on us poor little voiceless children.

      Liked by 2 people

      • December 21, 2016 8:05 pm

        Of course they do not teach that any more do they? It is no longer about science but rather agenda.

        Like

    • December 21, 2016 8:04 pm

      Ain’t that the truth Bunkerville? CJ’s video sums it up perfectly!

      Liked by 1 person

  7. January 22, 2017 12:11 pm

    If 99% of respectable doctors told you that you have cancer, would you seek treatment or believe the 1% of respectable doctors who say you don’t have cancer? Would you take that chance or believe the 99% of respectable doctors and seek treatment?

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. Climate scientist retires in order to keep her ‘scientific integrity’ | America's Watchtower

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: