Lisa Page’s testimony contradicts Peter Strzok’s testimony

  After initially refusing to comply with a subpoena to testify in front of the Congress about her anti-Trump texts to her co-worker and lover, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page finally testified and it turns out her testimony does not quite match Peter Strzok’s testimony.

  Peter Strzok basically said people were misinterpreting his texts and that there was no political bias in texts which read “we’ll stop him” or talked about an “insurance policy” to stop the President. But Lisa Page admitted the texts were pretty clear and actually meant what they said. Here is more:

A Republican lawmaker says the testimony of former FBI attorney Lisa Page before House investigators differed greatly from her lover and bureau special agent Peter Strzok.

Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) told reporters Monday that Page’s closed-door testimony yielded new leads in its investigation into the FBI’s surveillance of the Trump campaign and handling of Hillary Clinton email probe.

“I think there are significant differences between their testimony about important material facts. She gave us a lot of new information that we didn’t have before. That will lead us to ask for some more people to make some more requests for information we do not yet have,” Ratcliffe said. “On many cases, she admits that the text messages mean exactly what they say as opposed to agent Strzok, who thinks all misinterpreted his own words on any text message that might be negative.”

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) echoed similar statements concerning Page’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, describing the former FBI lawyer as “certainly more cooperative than Peter Strzok.” Page provided new “pieces of information [that] filled in some blanks along the way, but we’ve got a huge jigsaw puzzle to put together,” the congressman said.

Steve King is now calling for more subpoenas:

In a letter to fellow Republican investigators, King is calling on committee leaders to subpoena the personal cell phones of both Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. “I wanna see the names of everyone who interviewed Hillary Clinton on July 2, 2016,” wrote the Iowa lawmaker. “I wanna see their notes. I want to consider bringing each of them forward to testify what went on inside that room and then see if their notes and their testimony matches up to the 302 document that, in the end, was the basis that Peter Strzok briefed James Comey off of.”

  It is pretty clear they both cannot be telling the truth, one of them is lying, and if I had to guess I think you can figure out who I think is the liar here. I agree with Representative King here, these two cannot be let off the hook because it is pretty clear members who were investigating for Russian collusion were indeed themselves colluding to stop the election of Donald Trump.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium