Skip to content

Iowa Democratic caucusgoers claim Bernie Sanders was shorted delegates

February 7, 2016

 In the wake of the Iowa caucuses there have been two main themes pushed on the American people. The first one is that Marco Rubio somehow won the caucuses even though he came in third place and the second one is that Ted Cruz stole the election from Donald Trump.

  The latter scenario presupposes the notion that Ben Carson had enough supporters to lose to Ted Cruz to change the results, and all indications are that Ben Carson did not have that type of support in the first place. And if this it is actually true why has not one person who was supposedly tricked into supporting Ted Cruz over Ben Carson come forward?

  But while the mainstream media has done everything in its power to negate the Cruz victory (dare I claim racism here?!) by claiming voter fraud it has ignored the close results in the Democratic caucuses, which were much closer than the Republican caucuses between Ted Cruz and Donald Trump.

  In addition to the willing suspension of disbelief it would require a thinking person to believe that against all odds Hillary Clinton won all six of the coin tosses which gave her a slight edge in the delegate count and allowed her to claim victory there are now reports coming out from caucusgoers that there were some shenanigans going on which took delegates away from Bernie Sanders in order to give Hillary Clinton more delegates than it appears she actually won.

  Here is more:

Keane Schwarz is certain he knows the outcome of the vote in his precinct: He was the lone caucusgoer in Woodbury County No. 43.

But the Iowa Democratic Party’s final results state that Hillary Clinton won one county delegate and Bernie Sanders received zero.

“I voted for Bernie,” Schwarz, 36, of Oto, told The Des Moines Register. “It was really suspicious … I’m actually pretty irate about it.”

  This man was the lone caucusgoer in his County, he voted for Bernie Sanders, and yet his County awarded the delegate to Hillary Clinton? He is right to be irate about this, but this is not the only example:

A total of 110 people were present for the final vote, and the count was 58 people for Sanders and 52 people for Clinton — which amounted to five county delegates for Sanders and four for Clinton, said Lonnie McCombs, a 59-year-old Knoxville Democrat who is retired from careers in the military and in manufacturing.

“That’s how it was recorded,” said McCombs, a Sanders backer.

But when the Knoxville Journal Express newspaper posted the Democratic Party’s official results, it showed Knoxville No. 3 results as Clinton with five county delegates and Sanders with four.

“It cost Bernie a (county) delegate,” said McCombs, who took to Facebook to report his concerns.

  Even Hillary Clinton’s precinct captain has admitted there was a mistake:

Steve Eck, who was Clinton’s precinct captain for Knoxville No. 3, confirmed: “Somebody transposed those numbers.”

  But wait, there is more:

Debra Langguth, who lives in Cedar Rapids No. 9, said the precinct’s four delegates split evenly between Sanders and Clinton, who won by just one person’s vote.

The problem, she said, was that 131 people signed in at the beginning of the caucus but two separate head counts showed that 136 people voted.

“No steps were ever taken to find out who these extra five people were. They could have had everyone step to one side of the room, and go to the other side as their names were read off the registration list,” Langguth said. “Who knows if these people were even registered to vote in our district.”

  In this precinct there were more votes recorded than eligible voters and the results just happened to favor Hillary Clinton, this sounds eerily familiar to the 2012 general election where more than 100% of registered voters voted in some areas and remarkably EVERY SINGLE VOTE WAS CAST FOR BARACK OBAMA! Even if only 100% of the registered voters turned out the odds of Mitt Romney not getting even one vote has to be astronomical! 

  But of course at that time the left told us voter fraud did not exist and that the right was only using this false crisis in order to push voter ID laws so that we could suppress the minority vote. But now that one of their own might have been scammed out of a victory they are crying foul. It is hard to feel sorry for these people, where were they in 2012 when we were trying to warn them that something was amiss? I would like to welcome these voters to our world but remember, you reap what you sow…

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

13 Comments leave one →
  1. petermc3 permalink
    February 7, 2016 6:26 pm

    Let’s call it a scandal and fat ass will get away with whatever if anything her operatives may have done at her direction. She will remain and always be the queen of the scandal. Overwhelming voter fraud, if it can be proven, is nothing to get one’s panties in a twist over in american elections these days. Just as Swerish authorities turn a blind eye to Muslim men raping their Viking women since they have predetermined that the norm is for a number of blonde-haired blue eyed-women to be raped by men who were heretofore subjugated and confined by their religion of piece -oops s I meant peace-to doing pushy pushy through a hole in the bed sheet with burqa wearing, non deodorant using, unshaven legged, side burns wearing, mustachioed, burly women, some noiseless or earless if punished by their husband for some unacceptable action such as reading a book, so do we expect democrats to commit what no republican would be allowed to perpetrate and get away with: Voter Fraud.

    Liked by 2 people

    • February 7, 2016 9:28 pm

      Yeah, if we call it a scandal it will somehow turn into a vast right wing conspiracy!


  2. Dr. Jeff permalink
    February 8, 2016 12:41 am

    It never stops with the Democrats. They cheat, lie and then cheat and lie some more while claiming that paranoid Conservatives are slinging false accusations. This time it’s all within the Democrat camp. Bernie Sanders is arguably the farthest Left Liberal candidate in decades, so I wonder what they’re going to say now?

    Liked by 2 people

    • February 8, 2016 6:10 am

      Exactly Dr. Jeff, this time it happened to one of their own by one of their own. I am sure many of the Democratic voters in Iowa are actually surprised this happened because they believed (or at least made themselves believe) that fraud did not happen and was a figment of the right’s imagination. Sometimes you have to experience something to believe it.

      Liked by 1 person

    • lou222 permalink
      February 8, 2016 4:32 pm

      Dr. J., I almost hope that Sanders can prove this, at least I am rooting for him. Better him taking Clinton down than us, right? What is the media going to do since it is not a Conservative putting up the red flag? I am not sure they know how to deal with in-party fighting, since they are always after US.

      Liked by 1 person

      • February 8, 2016 7:08 pm

        I would love to see him push this Lou, but I bet the party will “persuade” him not to since it goes against the mantra. At least some Democratic voters now know that we are right, for whatever that is worth…

        Liked by 1 person

  3. February 8, 2016 6:18 am

    It looks like they completed an audit and Hillary still won, but only by .25%. Now about those coin tosses…

    Liked by 1 person

    • lou222 permalink
      February 8, 2016 4:33 pm

      We should ALL be that lucky! She is one very lucky person, has been all her life! Put her right up there with the Obamas when it comes to luck.

      Liked by 1 person


  1. Iowa Democratic caucusgoers claim Bernie Sanders was shorted delegates | Rifleman III Journal
  2. Hillary Clinton mulls a campaign staff shake-up after the New Hampshire primary | America's Watchtower
  3. Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton win the same number of New Hampshire delegates | America's Watchtower
  4. Bernie Sanders supporters ‘revolt’ against the superdelegates | America's Watchtower

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: