Skip to content
Advertisements

New report: NASA and NOAA global warming temperature adjustments are not a ‘valid representation of reality’

July 6, 2017

  I have written a few posts in the last couple of years about how NASA and NOAA have been adjusting the historical temperatures in order to make it appear as if the earth is warming when it might not be. Here is one of the posts I have written which includes links to other posts I have written.

  A new study is out which concluded these adjustments are “totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

  First a look at the people who agree with this study:

Dr. Alan Carlin
Retired Senior Analyst and manager, US Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC.
Author, Environmentalism Gone Mad, Stairway Press, 2015.
Ph.D., Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
BS, Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
Dr. Harold H. Doiron
Retired VP-Engineering Analysis and Test Division, InDyne, Inc.
Ex-NASA JSC, Aerospace Consultant
B.S. Physics, University of Louisiana – Lafayette
M.S., Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston
Dr. Theodore R. Eck
Ph.D., Economics, Michigan State University
M.A, Economics, University of Michigan
Fulbright Professor of International Economics
Former Chief Economist of Amoco Corp. and Exxon Venezuela
Advisory Board of the Gas Technology Institute and Energy Intelligence Group
Dr. Richard A. Keen
Instructor Emeritus of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado
Ph.D., Geography/Climatology, University of Colorado
M.S., Astro-Geophysics, University of Colorado
B.A., Astronomy, Northwestern University
Dr. Anthony R. Lupo
IPCC Expert Reviewer
Professor, Atmospheric Science, University of Missouri
Ph.D., Atmospheric Science, Purdue University
M.S., Atmospheric Science, Purdue University
Dr. Thomas P. Sheahen
Ph.D., Physics, M.I.T.
B.S., Physics, M.I.T.
Dr. George T. Wolff
Former Chair EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee
Ph.D., Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University
M.S., Meteorology, New York University
B.S., Chemical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology

That looks to me to be a pretty credible list. Here is the conclusion:

As a result, this research sought to validate the current estimates of
GAST using the best available relevant data. This included the best
documented and understood data sets from the U.S. and elsewhere
as well as global data from satellites that provide far more extensive
global coverage and are not contaminated by bad siting and
urbanization impacts. Satellite data integrity also benefits from having
cross checks between UAH and RSS as well as with Balloon data.
The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data
sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of
their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical
temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and
credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to
conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years
have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting
warming.
Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for
EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these
research findings.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

Advertisements
9 Comments leave one →
  1. July 6, 2017 9:49 pm

    Liked by 2 people

    • July 7, 2017 5:22 am

      Pretty much…

      Liked by 1 person

    • July 7, 2017 10:38 am

      ha, good one.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. HattieCaph permalink
    July 7, 2017 2:39 am

    I value the article. Awesome. http://22mcdjlp.tumblr.com/ – Tedesko

    Like

  3. July 7, 2017 3:49 am

    Reblogged this on Brittius.

    Liked by 1 person

    • July 7, 2017 5:23 am

      Thank you for the reblog.

      Like

      • July 7, 2017 6:27 am

        You’re welcome.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. July 8, 2017 3:11 pm

    Well, we finally get redemption after beating on this for years… how many of our posts after time goes by turn out to be the real story after the media has long argued against our points?

    Liked by 1 person

    • July 8, 2017 6:21 pm

      It sure does seem vindicating after years of scorn! But of course the left will ignore this while still pushing the 97% lie despite more scientists questioning the numbers every day.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: