Skip to content

Open thread for Monday August 13th

August 13, 2012

 I got a suggestion in an email that it might be a good idea to post an open thread every day to provide people with a place to post links to political articles others (including myself) might be interested in, as well as providing a place for people to chat about what is going on during the day.

  I thought it sounded like an interesting idea and have decided to give it a chance, if people like it and it is popular I will keep it going.

   Whose going to get the ball rolling?

Gunrunner: Darrell Issa to sue Eric Holder on Monday over Fast and Furious documents

August 12, 2012

 It is now being reported here that tomorrow Darrell Issa will sue Eric Holder in civil court in a last ditch attempt to finally get his hands on the documents Eric Holder has gone to great lengths to hide.

The committee expects to file the civil contempt suit against the attorney general Monday,” a Republican source said. The suit will be filed in the federal district court for the District of Columbia

  As regular readers of America’s Watchtower already know, Darrell Issa and the Oversight Committee found Eric Holder in Contempt of Congress for failing to comply with a subpoena request for documents which I suspect tie the embattled attorney general directly to the Fast and Furious scandal, and immediately following this vote Eric Holder ran to Barack Obama and begged him to seal these documents using executive privilege. Not wanting this to come to a head before the election, Barack Obama naturally obliged putting politics ahead of justice.

  Darrell Issa is now taking the next step and I for one couldn’t be happier that he isn’t going to back down after coming so far. Just when we thought the investigation might have been effectively killed by the man who promised to have the most open, honest, and transparent administration in history it looks like it might be heating up again.

Mitt Romney chooses Paul Ryan as his running mate

August 11, 2012

  It is now being reported that Mitt Romney has chosen Wisconsin Representative Paul Ryan as his running mate and the official announcement will come at an event at 9:00 this morning in Virginia.

  Paul Ryan was not my first choice but he is a good choice, and much better than Tim Pawlenty, being that he is maybe the only person in Washington who understands how desperate the economic situation is becoming. And he is the one person who put forth a legitimate budget plan to address the situation while most Democrats and Republicans were afraid to tackle this tough issue due to political reasons. We have not had a budget passed in four years while politicians in Washington steered clear of Ryan’s plan and pretended it didn’t exist.

  Ironically, his greatest strength is also going to his biggest problem moving forward in the campaign. Do you remember this: Read more…

Democrats release racist campaign ad against Allen West

August 9, 2012

  Just when you thought desperate Democrats couldn’t sink any lower than claiming Mitt Romney was a felon who also caused a woman to die from cancer they manage to lower the political limbo bar and dance right under it without any problem.

  This time the target is Allen West: American Sunrise PAC  released a racist ad showing Allen West in a boxing ring beating up white women and stealing money from black families. This is nothing short of despicable and today Allen West responded to this attack:

I spent my life in uniform fighting for our great nation and protecting all Americans.  The ad being run against me by my opponent’s family depicting violence against women and senior citizens is reprehensible.  It plays on stereotypes and fear to divide Americans, and it cheapens the very real and tragic occurrences of violence against women and seniors.  The American people are suffering from crushing debt, horrific tax and regulatory policies, and epic unemployment. This classless ad shows a lack of regard for the issues plaguing our nation. This ad reflects the sad state of politics in our Republic with those who seek to destroy a person’s character to cover for their lack of intellectual ability and integrity.

  A brilliant response from Allen West and Mitt Romney would do well to take notice of how to properly respond to this type of attack.

  Democrats are likely to defend this ad by claiming it was simply a metaphor for Republicans and their goal to protect the rich by hurting the middle class and the poor. They will claim there is no racism involved here and they will claim Republicans are trying to drum up a false controversy.

  I would ask anyone who tries to defend this ad to ask themselves what they would be saying if the Republicans ran an ad that depicted Barack Obama beating up white women and stealing money. I have a feeling we know what they would be saying.

Gunrunner: Fast and Furious weapon linked to an assassination attempt on a Tijuana police chief

August 8, 2012

  In addition to the deaths of Brian Terry, Jamie Zapata, and at least three hundred Mexican civilians with the use of weapons sold to the drug cartels by the United States government during the ill-fated Fast and Furious operation there was the little reported fact that the brother of a Mexican prosecutor,  Patricia Gonzalez, was also murdered with a weapon linked to the deadly scandal. This news was quickly covered up:

Tonya English, emailed her supervisors David Voth and Hope MacCallister asking  them to “not release any information” on the Fast and Furious connection to that  murder

  Because the House voted to hold Eric Holder in civil contempt of Congress they are able to move forward with a lawsuit against the president’s assertion of executive privilege in regards to the scandal. They are now planning to sue in federal court for the release of the long sought after documents, and during this process we have now learned of yet another major crime attempted with a Fast and Furious linked weapon.

  Read more…

Rod Blagojevich claims he thought $25,000 was funneled to Barack Obama in the pay to play scheme

August 8, 2012

  Almost immediately after ascending to the office which he now holds, Barack Obama became entangled in his first scandal when it was learned that Rod Blogjevich was involved in a pay to play scheme by attempting to sell Barack Obama’s vacant Senate seat. This scandal got pretty close to Barack Obama and he was actually interviewed by federal authorities before he was cleared.

  According to a new book, Rod Blagojevich was caught on wire taps stating that he believed Barack Obama’s campaign received $25,000 in contributions from Tony Rezko in the scandal and this was something the federal agents looked into but didn’t find credible. The Obama campaign is also claiming this is false:

The White House referred questions about the matter to the Obama campaign. Ben
LaBolt, a campaign spokesman, said the claim “is preposterous and it is false.
No such payment was ever offered or made, and there never has been any
suggestion or question of it from anyone, except apparently by Rod Blagojevich.”

You must keep in mind that the source of this allegation is inherently
unreliable and not credible,” said the attorney, Joseph J. Duffy

  Of course, Barack Obama has had a long history with the disgraced and imprisoned Tony Rezko including a sweetheart land deal: Read more…

Report claims cronyism and politics stopped Eric Holder from prosecuting Wall Street executives

August 7, 2012

   When Barack Obama was running for president in 2008 he railed against Wall Street for causing the economy to crash and promised to crack down on the greedy bankers and Wall Street investors who only cared about themselves and unscrupulously made millions on the backs of others. He promised to represent Main Street America, not Wall Street America. I paraphrase there but here is some of what he and Eric Holder said after Barack Obama gained the office he currently holds:

in 2009, Obama blamed the 2008 financial collapse on “reckless speculation of  bankers” while Holder charged that “unscrupulous executives, Ponzi scheme  operators and common criminals alike have targeted the pocketbooks and  retirement accounts of middle class Americans

  With Barack Obama once again ratcheting up the bourgeoisie/proletariat class warfare rhetoric for the 2012 election campaign it leads us to ask the following question: If Barack Obama was so opposed to Wall Street in 2008, and if Barack Obama is still opposed to the rich in America why didn’t he do anything about Wall Street during his first term as he promised he would?

  Read more…

Emails show Timothy Geithner cutoff the pensions of non-union Delphi workers as part of the auto bailout

August 7, 2012

  You may or may not remember this, but when the Obama regime bailed out the automakers industry 20,000 non-union retirees lost their rightfully earned pensions while all retired union members  were allowed to keep what they rightfully earned during the course of their careers.

  This, of course, is in direct contrast to what Barack Obama stated when he was running for the office he currently holds. During the 2008 campaign Barack Obama said not protecting a person’s pension was “not the America I believe in” and promised to protect the workers’ interests ahead of the interests of the bankers:

Right now, bankruptcy laws are more focused on protecting banks than protecting  pensions,” Obama said then. “And, I don’t think that’s fair. It’s not the  America I believe in. It’s time to stop cutting back the safety net for working  people while we protect golden parachutes for the well-off. If you’ve worked  hard and played by the rules, then you’ve earned your pension. If a company goes  bankrupt, then workers need to be our top priority, not an afterthought

  Apparently, although he didn’t say so, he was only talking about unionized workers and not all workers because the Obama regime made sure the Democrats’ largest special interest group was taken care of while the non-union workers lost what they earned and he did nothing to stop it. So much for earning your pension if you are not a member of Barack Obama’s prefered class of people.

  Read more…

This day in history: The Enola Gay drops the bomb on Hiroshima

August 6, 2012

  First, let me say thank you to John at Sentry Journal for reminding me that today is the anniversary of the beginning of the end of WWII in the Pacific theater. Please check out his post to see  Enola Gay crew member “Dutch” Van Kirk’s account of the bombing of Hiroshima, it is fascinating.

  I have decided to repost an article I wrote in 2010 commemorating the occasion, here it is in full:

  On the morning of August 6th 1945, a plane named the “Enola Gay” took off from an airfield on Tinian Island and headed for mainland Japan carrying a very special cargo named “Little Boy.”

  Once Colonel Paul Tibbets reached the Japanese city of Hiroshima–a strategic military target located in the middle of a civilian city–he unleashed “Little Boy.” The effects were immediate and devastating, some 70,000 people died on the first day, while estimates for the total loss of life are somewhere around 150,000-200,000. Nobody knows for sure how many Japanese died as a direct result of this bombing.

  But still the Japanese–who all had sworn to fight until the death–refused to surrender. Even in the face of warnings by Harry Truman that the United States had in its possession the most powerful explosive known to man, and would continue to use it if the Japanese did not tender its unconditional surrender they refused to give in.

  Three days later “Fat Man” was dropped on Nagasaki and the end result was inevitable and although Hirohito never used the word surrender: “However, it is according to the dictates of time and fate that we have resolved to pave the way for a grand peace for all the generations to come by enduring the unendurable and suffering what is insufferable,” preferring to call surrender unendurable and insufferable– everybody knew that that meant. Nine days after the first bomb was dropped Japan had surrendered, the war was over.

  In the 65 years that have followed the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki it has been greatly debated whether the bombings were necessary or if the United States dropped the bombs solely as a show of force to other nations (Russia–which had entered the war against Japan after Hiroshima–in particular.)

  Some have claimed that Japan was on the verge of surrendering anyway, and that all we had to do was give them more time. While it is true that Hirohito had had discussions with his generals about surrender, he rejected any notion of surrender every time it was brought up. He had no intention of surrendering after all of these years of telling every Japanese person that to die for the emperor was glorious and that Japan would never surrender.

  This mentality was so engrained in the Japanese soldier that once it was learned that Hirohito had decided to “endure the unendurable” the military leaders actually started planning a coup to overthrow him and continue the war until every man was dead–swearing to jump off the cliffs to their deaths if necessary instead of surrendering.

  If the bombs were not dropped and a full-scale invasion of mainland Japan was executed (as General MacArthur hoped for) instead, the invasion force would have dwarfed the allied invasion in Normandy on D-Day and it is estimated that extending the war would have cost America alone an additional one million plus casualties.

  The effects of the bombings were brutal but they brought a swift end to a brutal war–in a way the war in the Pacific may have been more brutal than the European theater, just look at the atrocities performed by Japanese soldiers on American POWs–that may have lingered on for who knows how long.

  The debate over the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki will forever be debated, but in my opinion while many lives were taken in such a short period of time, the lives saved over the longterm because of the continued fighting is all the justification needed.

Then and now: Harry Reid on making baseless accusations

August 5, 2012

  Last week Harry Reid accused Mitt Romney of failing to pay taxes for ten years. He made this claim with no evidence, siting an anonymous phone call he received by someone he claimed was close to Mitt Romney. This was a baseless claim designed for one reason and one reason only–smear the Republican nominee and sow the seeds of doubt about Mitt Romney’s trustworthiness with the voters.

 When reporters pressed Harry Reid about his comments he refused to back down and in fact reasserted the baseless claim that Mitt Romney didn’t pay taxes for a decade. When reporters asked him to reveal his source he remained indignant and declared he didn’t think “the burden should be on me” to prove the claims were true, but rather based solely on his accusation Mitt Romney is the one who should prove the claim is false. Harry Reid’s philosophy appears to be this: any accusation made by anyone is a serious charge and because of this that person is obligated to prove the claim false even if there is no evidence to indict that person. A person is guilty until proven innocent.

   But apparently Harry Reid didn’t always feel this way. Some thirty years ago Harry Reid was accused, without evidence, of being in bed with the mob: Read more…